With an increased focus on ‘green loans’ and ‘sustainability-linked loans’, the two terms are sometimes conflated. Iain Rodley of Addleshaw Goddard explores the distinctions between the two financial products
Responding to sustainability and climate change-related risk and opportunity is already high on the agenda for many social housing organisations and funders.
We are seeing an increased focus on green loans and sustainability-linked loans – but the term ‘green loan’ is often being used to cover both financial products.
What is a green loan?
A green loan is defined by the Loan Market Association’s (LMA) ‘Green and Sustainable Lending Glossary of Terms’ as any type of loan instrument made available exclusively to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new and/or existing eligible ‘green projects’.
While the definitions of ‘green’ and ‘green projects’ may vary depending on sector and geography, example indicative categories of eligibility contained in the LMA’s Green Loan Principles (GLP) include renewable energy, energy efficiency, climate change adaptation and green buildings that meet regional, national or internationally recognised standards or certifications.
The GLP provides a framework for green loans based on the following four core components:
An example of a green loan might include a registered provider funding renewable energy projects relating to its housing stock or leasing.
What is a sustainability-linked loan?
A sustainability-linked loan (SLL) is defined by the LMA’s glossary as any type of loan instrument and/or contingent facility (eg bonding line, guarantee line, letter of credit) that incentivises the borrower’s achievement of ambitious, predetermined sustainability performance objectives.
A borrower’s sustainability performance is measured using sustainability performance targets (SPTs), which include key performance indicators, external ratings and/or equivalent metrics that measure improvements in the borrower’s sustainability profile.
Again, while the definitions of ‘sustainable’ and ‘sustainability’ may vary depending on sector and geography, examples of common improvements that an SPT in a particular category might seek to measure are contained in the LMA Sustainability Linked Loan Principles. They include renewable energy, affordable housing, sustainable sourcing and energy efficiency.
Addleshaw Goddard recently advised NatWest on its first SLL, which was with Bromford Housing Group.
The SPT in this case was energy efficiency and an ambitious target was agreed relating to an upgrade of existing housing stock with an energy efficiency rating of C or below, exceeding the minimum energy efficiency standard required for rented residential property (currently E). Bromford will achieve a margin reduction if it meets the SPT.
Addleshaw Goddard has advised funders including BNP Paribas and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation on a number of other SLLs, including deals with L&Q, Peabody Trust, Clarion, Catalyst and PA Housing.
The LMA Sustainability Linked Loan Principles provide a framework for SLLs based on the following four core components:
The key difference?
The fundamental determinant of a green loan is the utilisation of loan proceeds for green projects, however the other core components of the Green Loan Principles must also be met.
The focus of the Sustainability Linked Loan Principles is incentivising the borrower’s efforts to improve its sustainability profile by aligning loan terms to the borrower’s performance against SPTs; the use of proceeds is not a key determinant in the categorisation of a SLL.
Iain Rodley, associate, Addleshaw Goddard; with thanks to Kate Cook, senior knowledge lawyer, and Jennifer Khanna, managing associate, Addleshaw Goddard
RELATED