ao link

The many implications of the Grenfell Tower fire

The terrible tragedy at Grenfell Tower has left the housing sector with much to consider.

One area that will not be at the forefront of most people’s minds, for understandable reasons, but which is an immediate consideration for finance directors and funders, is the implications for loan arrangements tied to existing tower blocks

 

As things currently stand, sector valuers are not issuing values for any tower blocks for the purposes of loan security.

 

For those clients that are contemplating a financing exercise, this is likely to mean in the short term that alternative security will need to be found or, if this is not possible, the transaction may likely need to be delayed or possibly restructured.

 

But for those who currently have tower blocks in charge, there are a number of other possible issues that may emerge over the longer term.


Read more

‘Grenfell tragedy changes everything’‘Grenfell tragedy changes everything’
Balancing risk and the housing crisis in the wake of the Grenfell Tower disasterBalancing risk and the housing crisis in the wake of the Grenfell Tower disaster
Government sets out terms for building regulations reviewGovernment sets out terms for building regulations review
Government will fully fund replacement of dangerous cladding, says PMGovernment will fully fund replacement of dangerous cladding, says PM
Revealed: fire safety spend for London’s biggest HAs likely to approach £3bnRevealed: fire safety spend for London’s biggest HAs likely to approach £3bn

 

All charged stock will be valued on a regular basis, typically every three or five years. But, in addition to this, nearly all lenders reserve the right to seek additional valuations, particularly if they have cause to believe that there may have been a significant loss of value.

 

So if you have tower blocks in charge, what should you do?

 

First, make sure you know when the next regular valuation of any tower blocks is to take place.

 

Second, think about the possible consequences of any tower blocks being assigned a nil value.

 

This could happen sooner than you think and (for the reasons mentioned above) outside the usual valuation cycle. Could this cause you to be in breach of any asset cover requirement?

 

Third, if there could be a potential breach on the horizon, think about how that could be mitigated.

 

Is there substitute security that could be provided? Does the relevant loan agreement provide for the use of cash as alternative security?

 

Bear in mind that charging substitute stock could take some time and there are likely to be detailed provisions in loan agreements about how release and/or substitution of security could work.


Lenders are likely to be sympathetic to any potential problem, so long as they are alerted to possible issues at the first possible opportunity and kept updated as matters develop.

 

It could for example be possible to negotiate some kind of temporary waiver or standstill.

 

Lenders may also look kindly on any request to relax some of the more detailed requirements around security release and/or substitution.

 

Solutions of this type should hopefully offer a timing window to allow the many and varied issues around the valuation of tower blocks to be worked through.

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.