ao link

Special report: housing associations’ impairments rise almost 40% in a year

Fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values result in impairments. Chloe Stothart and Robyn Wilson report

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Use our data to find out which housing associations had higher impairments, lower impairments or an impairment reversal in 2019 #UKhousing #SocialHousingFinance

Fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values result in impairments. Chloe Stothart and Robyn Wilson report #UKhousing #SocialHousingFinance

Total net impairments continued to rise for the UK’s largest housing associations (HAs) in the most recent complete set of accounts.

 

Figures showed impairments totalling £60.2m for 2018/19, up from £42.2m the year before. This represented a near-40 per cent increase.

 

Reasons cited for the impairments included reduced land values and contractor insolvencies, with costs relating to fire safety still surfacing.

 

Social Housing’s analysis is based on the financial accounts of the 130 largest HAs in the UK by stock. Out of the 130, 52 HAs recorded impairments. Of these, 37 had impairments that were higher than in the previous year and 15 had impairments that were lower. In addition, seven saw an uplift in value, while the remaining 27 had not recorded an impairment since 2016/17 or earlier.


Read more

HA’s surplus slides as it books £10m impairment amid housing market fearsHA’s surplus slides as it books £10m impairment amid housing market fears
Special reports librarySpecial reports library
Special report: housing associations’ impairments rise by nearly a thirdSpecial report: housing associations’ impairments rise by nearly a third
Building safety: the making of a regulatorBuilding safety: the making of a regulator

Together, these impairments resulted in a 1.7 per cent reduction in total operating surplus, standing at £3.6bn – a decrease similar to last year when the surplus dropped by two per cent.

 

This year’s reduction in total operating surplus was made up of a 3.6 per cent reduction among the HAs that had higher impairments and a 1.9 per cent reduction in those that had lower impairments. It was slightly offset by a 1.5 per cent increase in surplus for the seven HAs that had a net reversal in impairment for the year.

 

A five-year view of impairments showed a 326 per cent jump in charges from £14.1m in 2014/15 (a particularly low year for charges) to £60.2m in 2018/19.

 

Interestingly, the net impairment figure seen in this year’s report is the second-highest total seen over the past 10 years, with the highest taking place in 2009/10, during the financial crisis, when impairments totalled £84.1m. The third-highest was seen in 2012/13 with £51.4m but beyond this, net impairments have broadly settled between £40m and £50m.

 

The G15 group of London’s largest HAs accounted for a third of the total impairments with £18.4m, with Homes for the North representing only a sliver of the net total at £0.2m.

 


 


Higher than previous year

 

Impairments for the 37 HAs in this group totalled £53.5m, compared with last year when the same HAs had charges totalling £0.36m.

 

This year marked the largest charge total seen among this particular group of HAs for impairments over the past 10 years, with last year being the lowest.

 

Clarion had the largest impairment at £11.6m, which resulted in a 4.7 per cent drop in its operating surplus. Although noteworthy, this operating surplus decrease is significantly less than some of its peers in the group.

 

The impairment was made up of £3.7m in ‘goodwill’, £3.6m in ‘non-housing fixed assets’ and £4.3m in relation to ‘stock’, according to its financial accounts. There was no further explanation of the charge beyond this, and no one was available for comment when approached by Social Housing.

 

The HA with the second-largest impairment was Paradigm with £5.5m for the year. This translated to a more sizeable 11.5 per cent reduction in its operating surplus to £47.9m.

 

In its financial accounts, the HA explained that the charge was an impairment across two of its developments, which had seen the group miss its operating margin target of 40 per cent (2019: 36.8 per cent). Explaining further, it said: “We have recognised impairment in total across our development pipeline of £5.5m due to a combination of contractor insolvency and reduced land value.”

Summary of housing association net impairment: UK 2018/19

Impairment/(reversal)Operating surplus 2018/19
Movement in net impairment 2017/18Number of housing associationsTotal number of units

18/19, £m

17/18,

£m

16/17, £m15/16, £m14/15, £m13/14, £m12/13, £m11/12, £m10/11, £m

09/10,

£m

Cumulative nine years, £m£mChange caused by impairment
Higher than in previous year

37

830,125

53.50

0.36

16.86

21.08

3.76

29.81

17.61

13.99

6.93

16.48

180.36

1,481.38

-3.61%

Lower than in previous year

15

492,567

13.98

43.37

22.43

8.10

7.57

5.49

15.09

10.74

15.50

26.36

168.64

756.78

-1.85%

Net uplift in value in 18/19

7

301,477

-7.26

-1.56

2.50

3.26

1.34

1.26

4.57

-1.38

3.30

8.29

14.30

494.08

+1.47%

Last impairment recorded in 16/17 or earlier

27

614,160

0.00

0.00

7.82

10.19

1.47

7.16

14.17

18.48

5.25

32.99

97.53

902.40

0.00%

Total net impairment

86

2,238,329

60.22

42.17

49.61

42.63

14.14

43.73

51.43

41.83

30.97

84.11

460.83

3,634.63

-1.66%

Source: Audited accounts 2017/18, and previous years. Compiled from a survey of accounts of the 130 largest housing associations in the UK, at consolidated group level

Note: Data to left of red line under FRS 102

Plus Dane Housing had a £3m impairment, which resulted in a 23 per cent decrease in its operating surplus. The group said this charge was in relation to one of its apartment blocks called Carriage Grove, which is based in Liverpool.

 

It was applied after carrying out an “extensive investigation” into fire safety concerns to “understand the scale of the problem” in the building. Remediation, demolition and disposal options were all explored as part of the investigation.

 

Peter Fahy, chair of Plus Dane, said the group had borne the cost of the investigatory works and the sale resulting in the impairment.

 

The largest drop in operating surplus in this group was at Lincolnshire Housing Partnership, which saw a 47 per cent decrease to £8.8m, following £4.2m of impairments relating to “losses of housing properties”, according to its accounts. The association has been contacted for comment.

2018/19 change in impairment: higher than previous year

37 housing associations

830,125

53.50

0.36

16.86

21.08

3.76

29.81

17.61

13.99

6.93

16.48

180.36

1,481.38

3.61%

Net impairmentOperating surplus 2018/19
Housing associationNumber of units

18/19 £m

17/18

£m

16/17 £m15/16 £m14/15 £m13/14 £m12/13 £m11/12 £m10/11 £m

09/10

£m

Cumulative nine years

£m

£mReduction caused by impairment

Clarion

125,881

11.60

0.70

9.40

5.80

-1.60

-1.97

-2.12

-0.80

0.06

8.75

29.83

249.00

4.66%

Sovereign

57,987

2.18

0.00

0.00

0.18

0.14

6.14

-0.26

0.45

0.69

-1.43

8.08

140.34

1.55%

Peabody

56,678

0.02

0.00

0.00

0.16

0.00

1.19

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.15

1.52

149.00

0.01%

Riverside

56,089

0.05

0.00

1.19

0.09

-1.30

2.90

3.39

2.00

0.00

7.67

15.97

67.54

0.08%

Anchor Hanover

53,441

0.18

-1.98

1.85

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

57.92

0.31%

Hyde

48,796

0.41

0.00

-1.55

1.18

0.36

7.30

-0.02

0.36

0.97

0.00

9.00

116.33

0.35%

Torus (Torus + Liverpool Mutual Homes to 2016)

37,561

0.28

0.00

0.00

3.64

0.00

0.00

0.45

-0.80

0.39

0.00

3.96

53.01

0.52%

WDH

31,439

0.18

0.09

1.68

2.66

2.20

0.95

2.45

0.11

0.03

0.05

10.39

30.88

0.60%

Your Housing Group

27,730

3.26

-0.03

1.35

0.67

0.71

1.51

0.57

0.07

0.09

0.00

8.20

29.85

10.91%

Karbon (Isos to 2016)

26,834

0.02

-0.03

0.74

0.03

0.46

0.15

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.64

31.84

0.07%

Longhurst

22,778

0.68

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.06

0.00

0.36

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.11

49.11

1.39%

Network Homes

21,235

4.40

0.00

-0.28

2.66

1.63

1.44

0.84

1.82

0.70

0.00

13.21

97.10

4.53%

Believe (County Durham)

18,315

0.98

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.98

17.36

5.66%

Bolton at Home

17,580

0.11

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

10.04

1.12%

PCH

15,961

1.11

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.11

15.63

7.08%

Beyond Housing

15,097

2.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.03

16.27

12.49%

Paradigm

14,908

5.50

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

5.50

47.94

11.47%

Plus Dane

13,681

3.02

0.00

0.41

0.34

0.00

9.51

8.84

8.02

2.90

0.00

33.04

13.15

23.00%

Regenda

13,003

1.51

-0.08

1.30

0.00

0.00

0.37

0.70

0.47

0.60

0.54

5.41

15.60

9.65%

Lincolnshire (Shoreline to 2017)

12,552

4.15

0.49

0.29

2.35

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

7.33

8.83

46.99%

Housing Plus Group

12,194

1.81

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.81

16.60

10.90%

First Choice Homes Oldham

11,445

2.46

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.46

10.27

23.92%

Aldwyck

11,150

0.80

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.38

1.23

32.20

2.48%

Futures

10,010

0.39

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

0.00

0.03

0.00

0.22

0.75

17.12

2.25%

Poplar Harca

9,485

4.02

1.10

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.14

0.65

0.00

0.00

6.92

25.92

15.53%

MHS Homes

9,064

0.12

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.12

0.77

0.07

0.00

0.00

1.07

26.37

0.45%

Town & Country

8,962

0.39

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.87

0.00

0.00

1.25

26.04

1.49%

Livin

8,408

0.16

0.08

0.01

0.25

0.06

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.55

9.54

1.64%

Westward

7,536

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

0.16

0.09

0.00

0.50

12.24

1.15%

Silva (Bracknell Forest Homes)

7,533

0.29

0.00

0.44

0.39

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.12

12.47

2.35%

Acis

7,400

0.27

0.00

0.00

0.03

0.00

0.05

0.13

0.32

0.00

0.00

0.79

10.55

2.53%

West Kent

7,308

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.01

18.38

0.05%

Castles & Coasts (Two Castles to 2017)

7,056

0.19

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.41

0.10

0.69

9.88

1.88%

Havebury

6,569

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

13.10

1.53%

Broadacres

6,316

0.11

0.00

0.05

0.66

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.05

1.07

9.91

1.14%

Southway

6,201

0.16

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.16

7.50

2.19%

Cobalt

5,942

0.32

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.32

6.55

4.90%

Source: Housing association audited accounts 2018/19

Note: Data to left of red line under FRS 102

Lower than previous year

 

Net impairments for HAs that had a lower impairment in 2019 than in 2018 added up to £14m, compared with 2017/18 when the same organisations reported £43.4m of impairments, the latter of which was the highest total seen among these HAs over the past 10 years.

 

The biggest drops on 2017/18 were at L&Q (£5m decrease), Together (£4.8m decrease) and Thirteen (£4.7m decrease).

 

This was in contrast to 2018, when all three appeared in the list of HAs whose impairments were higher than in the previous year. L&Q, for example, had the second-largest impairment at £9m in 2017/18, after finding a £2m impairment was required to a number of high-rise blocks that had aluminium composite material cladding.

 

It also recognised a £4m impairment on social housing properties held for letting and £3m on social housing units under construction. The impairment lowered its operating surplus by nearly three per cent.

 

This year (2019), however, its impairment charge decreased to £4m, reducing its operating surplus by two per cent. In its 2019 financial accounts, L&Q said the group had recognised a £4m impairment on 21 low-cost homeownership properties under construction (2018: £4m social housing properties held for letting, £3m social housing homes under construction).

 

Thirteen this year recorded a £0.42m impairment in relation to its general needs stock. It reported a £5.1m impairment last year in relation to five of its high-rise blocks judged to be obsolete or in areas of low demand.

Together, meanwhile, reported a £0.18m charge for 93 of its general needs homes, compared with £5.1m the year before for 474 properties the association decided to demolish, remodel or sell.

2018/19 change in impairment: lower than previous year

15 housing associations

492,567

13.98

43.37

22.43

8.10

7.57

5.49

15.09

10.74

15.50

26.36

168.64

756.78

1.85%

Net impairmentOperating surplus 2018/19
Housing associationNumber of units

18/19 £m

17/18

£m

16/17 £m15/16 £m14/15 £m13/14 £m12/13 £m11/12 £m10/11 £m

09/10

£m

Cumulative nine years £m£mReduction caused by impairment

Sanctuary

101,218

1.40

1.70

7.60

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.40

0.00

0.40

22.40

34.10

177.90

0.79%

L&Q

95,539

4.00

9.00

0.00

0.00

-2.00

-3.00

-2.00

-0.80

6.70

-1.00

10.90

198.00

2.02%

A2Dominion

38,133

0.80

1.50

0.00

0.00

1.00

1.10

8.20

3.70

0.00

0.00

16.30

53.60

1.49%

Together

36,512

0.18

4.99

1.13

1.97

-0.16

0.00

1.05

0.00

0.40

0.00

9.56

22.86

0.79%

Thirteen

33,858

0.42

5.10

0.00

0.69

3.17

1.12

-0.16

0.25

4.09

0.57

15.25

32.00

1.32%

Stonewater

32,354

0.75

1.95

0.59

0.13

-1.18

0.09

0.41

3.69

0.10

0.00

6.55

56.38

1.33%

Citizen (WM)

30,816

2.08

3.65

3.09

0.00

0.00

0.16

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

8.98

44.63

4.65%

Incommunities

23,200

1.50

4.50

7.10

0.94

0.00

0.42

0.53

0.93

1.25

0.00

17.15

13.08

11.47%

Accent

20,623

0.59

1.05

0.00

0.00

4.45

5.56

0.99

1.21

1.62

3.61

19.08

22.89

2.57%

East Midlands

19,599

-0.01

0.00

0.20

0.11

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.30

30.91

0.03%

Great Places

19,305

0.39

3.33

1.35

0.22

0.15

0.00

0.00

0.50

0.54

0.00

6.48

32.74

1.19%

Knowsley

13,251

0.25

2.77

0.66

2.04

0.67

0.00

0.07

0.42

0.39

0.34

7.62

11.13

2.25%

RHP

10,407

0.54

1.24

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.77

20.29

2.64%

Progress

10,252

0.24

0.66

0.35

1.84

1.46

0.29

0.41

0.42

0.00

0.00

5.66

18.80

1.28%

Wandle

7,500

0.86

1.94

0.36

-0.04

0.00

-0.25

5.20

0.43

0.00

0.43

8.93

21.56

3.98%

Source: Housing association audited accounts 2018/19

Note: Data to left of red line under FRS 102

Individual HAs: reversals

 

This report also looks at impairment reversals and write-backs, which are credits rather than charges to the operating surplus.

 

Some impairments are partially reversed the following year. For example, the value of shared ownership, open market sale, market rent and student rent properties might be higher than expected in a buoyant market.

 

Similarly, land values that were above expectations or build costs that were lower than forecast can also result in a write-back.

 

As was seen last year, there were seven HAs that reported reversals. These reversals totalled £7.3m. The organisations were The Guinness Partnership, Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing, Home Group, Optivo, Orbit, Moat and Magenta.

 

Of these, Home Group had the largest reversal at £2.3m, which followed a £4.1m impairment the year before – the bulk of which was relating to housing properties under construction, according to its financial accounts.

Impairment reversal, ie net uplift in value in 2018/19

7 HAs

301,477

-7.26

-7.26

0.00

-1.56

2.50

3.26

1.34

1.26

4.57

-1.38

3.30

8.29

14.30

494.08

+1.47%

Impairment/(reversal) results 2018/19 Net impairment/(reversal) in previous years Operating surplus 2018/19
Housing associationNumber of unitsNet reversal of impairment £mUplift in value £mImpairment £m

17/18 £m

16/17

£m

15/16 £m14/15 £m13/14 £m12/13 £m11/12 £m10/11 £m

09/10

£m

Cumulative impairment seven years, £m£mIncrease caused by reversal

Guinness

64,944

-1.20

-1.20

0.00

-2.90

-2.00

2.70

0.60

2.30

2.00

1.80

2.70

0.80

6.80

85.80

+1.40%

MTVH

57,043

-2.21

-2.21

0.00

-1.40

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.24

-0.20

1.00

1.23

-1.82

107.48

+2.05%

Home

55,424

-2.32

-2.32

0.00

4.11

1.52

1.12

0.01

-0.21

-1.59

0.25

-0.23

-1.01

1.65

80.32

+2.89%

Optivo

47,255

-0.60

-0.60

0.00

-0.73

-0.52

-1.59

-0.13

-1.76

2.55

-3.42

-1.10

5.22

-2.08

90.75

+0.67%

Orbit

43,470

-0.10

-0.10

0.00

0.10

1.90

0.65

-0.04

0.85

1.88

-0.45

0.32

0.00

5.11

86.50

+0.12%

Moat

20,636

-0.17

-0.17

0.00

-0.74

1.60

0.39

0.90

0.09

-0.02

0.64

0.60

2.04

5.31

37.65

+0.45%

Magenta

12,705

-0.67

-0.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

-0.67

5.58

+11.93%

Source: Housing association audited accounts 2018/19

Note: Data to left of red line under FRS 102

Methodology

This report provides an insight into which associations saw impairment increases year-on-year and by how much. It also shows where impairment has reduced compared with the previous year. The data comes from organisations’ notes on the operating surplus in their audited accounts. It includes impairments to housing and non-housing assets.

 

The impairments as stated in the operating surplus – rather than the impairments stated in the note on fixed assets – were used because Social Housing is interested in the effect of impairment on surplus. Impairment reviews are carried out annually by associations.

 

Where there is evidence of impairment, assets are written down to the recoverable amount. Any write-down is charged to the operating surplus, and reversals of impairments are stated there, too.

 

The report looks at the 130 biggest associations by stock. Data before 2014 was put together under the UK GAAP accounting standard and later figures were done under FRS 102 – apart from those for Sanctuary, which uses the EU IFRS standard. Impairment was one of the aspects of accounting that changed under FRS 102 compared with UK GAAP.

 

Data before 2016/17 for LiveWest is combined figures for Knightstone and DCH where available, data before 2013/14 for Stonewater is combined Jephson and Raglan figures, data before 2016/17 for Optivo is combined Amicus Horizon and Viridian figures, data before 2014/15 for Clarion is combined figures for Affinity Sutton and Circle, and data before 2015/16 is combined figures for Asra and Paragon.

 

Figures for Torus before 2016 are combined figures for Torus and Liverpool Mutual. Numbers for Karbon are for Isos up to 2016. For Lincolnshire Housing Partnership numbers are for Shoreline up to 2017. Data for Castles & Coasts is for Two Castles up to 2017.

Social Housing special reports

Social Housing special reports

Each month Social Housing focuses on a specific aspect of housing finance and collates and scrutinises the data for hundreds of housing organisations.

 

The reports below contain unparalleled commentary and analysis along with detailed sortable and searchable data tables.

 

 

Unit costs 2019 Our analysis of data from the English regulator has found that unit costs have risen among all types of housing association, with overall maintenance costs seeing the highest weighted average increase of nearly seven per cent

 

Impairment 2019 Housing associations’ impairments rise almost 40% in a year, driven by fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values

 

Global accounts 2018/19 Housing associations’ surplus for the year before tax decreased by five per cent to £3.76bn, driven by a 6.6 per cent drop in England

 

Affordable rent profile 2018/19 The level of affordable lettings dropped for the third year in a row

 

Staff pay Data from audited accounts of 206 housing associations shows that average staff pay in 2018/19 was £31,787 – a rise of 3.2 per cent over a 12-month period

 

Professionals’ league Our exclusive professionals’ league finds that activity continued apace in 2019, when housing associations increasingly looked to private placements

 

Sales proceeds Despite a 10 per cent rise in housing associations’ income from development sales in the last financial year, sales revenue is likely to remain flat over the coming years as a result of the property market downturn

 

Capital commitments The total capital commitments of 200 housing associations rose by 15 per cent in the past year, analysis by Social Housing has found

 

Reliance on sales surplus Social Housing finds that the total sales surplus of 150 English registered providers has dropped by nearly 10 per cent, as a result of lower market sales surplus

 

Stock dispersal How many council areas does your housing association operate in? How concentrated is its stock?

 

Accounts digest 2018/19 How does your housing association’s finances compare to others?

 

Housing Revenue Account part two How do councils compare in their 2018/19 Housing Revenue Account positions? Steve Partridge of Savills takes an in-depth look

 

Diversification of income We look at how housing associations are diversifying their income, and finds that they made 10.3 per cent more revenue from shared ownership and non-social housing activity

 

Impairment 2017/18 Social Housing takes a close look at the accounts of the 130 largest housing associations, and finds that impairments rose by nearly a third to £78.4m in 2018

 

Global accounts Social Housing’s analysis of the sector’s global accounts finds that housing associations’ pre-tax surplus fell last year – driven by drops in England, Scotland and Wales (August 2019)

 

Affordable rent profile We find that the number of affordable rent lettings recorded last year by housing associations in England has dropped for the second year in a row, suggesting that the sector is shifting away from the tenure

 

Capital commitments We scrutinise the capital commitments of the 208 largest housing associations in the UK (June 2019)

 

Housing Revenue Account part one Steve Partridge of Savills takes a look at the financial factors councils should consider in their Housing Revenue Account business planning (May 2019)

 

Reliance on sales surplus Our analysis reveals that profits form 42 per cent of 150 English housing associations’ total surplus (April 2019)

 

Sales proceeds We look at housing associations’ build-for-sale income and find a two per cent increase in 2017/18 (March 2019)

 

Shared ownership sales England, excluding London, has seen a four per cent rise in shared ownership sales – much lower than last year’s 16 per cent increase (February 2019)

 

Stock dispersal We show that housing associations’ general needs stock is becoming more concentrated within their local authority areas (January 2019)

 

Click here to find more special reports

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.