A number of housing associations are reassessing their private rented sector portfolios, after years of building up assets across the sector.
Organisations including L&Q and Notting Hill Genesis (NHG) told Social Housing they are weighing up how best to make use of the hugely valuable PRS assets they have, while one Northern housing association, which wished to remain anonymous, said it is pulling back.
The reveal comes at a time of serious growth across the professional PRS, with supply having increased by more than 50 per cent per year since 2015, according to research by JLL. It also follows the decision by Metropolitan Thames Valley to sell its minority stake in PRS brand Fizzy Living to US-based investor, Greystar, in a £400m deal last December.
Waqar Ahmed, finance director at L&Q, said that L&Q PRS Co now has 2,700 PRS homes, with a value of around £1.2bn, and that it is looking at ways to release equity to create more capacity for the wider group to develop more homes. The association recently scaled back its ambitions to deliver 10,000 homes a year to 3,000.
He said: “We own 100 per cent of L&Q PRS Co; there are no other investors. There is a third-party debt in there from the government guarantee scheme, which is administered by [ARA] Venn, but we own the shares.
“So, I suppose the question for us is: do we do a joint venture, do we dispose of 50 per cent of equity, do we dispose of larger chunks, or do we keep it?”
NHG’s market rent brand Folio London said it is looking at next steps for its portfolio, which currently has around £1bn of assets.
Lizzie Stevens, director at Folio London, ruled out a sale of the portfolio, but said: “We’ve got about 3,500 units, which have grown year on year. We are actually at a bit of a stage where we’re just reviewing what we’re doing with it.
“It’s very valuable and we’re quite proud of that, but we are a housing association and it’s not our core function. So, at the minute, we’re looking at whether we continue to grow it, or actually do we scale it back a little bit and then continue to grow it again?”
Meanwhile, one Northern housing association said it is pulling back from the sector. The PRS previously formed part of the group’s strategy. It had set a target of delivering around a third build-to-rent, a third affordable and a third outright sale across its schemes. But it said that its PRS delivery today is “very, very low”.
Greater levels of grant for delivering affordable homes and an inability to make a major PRS development “stack up” were some of the key drivers behind this decision, it said.
Social Housing’s weekly news bulletin delivers the latest news and insight across finance and funding, regulation and governance, policy and strategy, straight to your inbox. Meanwhile, news alerts bring you the biggest stories as they land.
Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters.
RELATED