An expert has indicated that social housing values could fall by up to 70 per cent next year in a worst-case scenario, when taking into account decarbonisation expenditure alongside the rent cap, and rising operating costs and discount rates.
Applied to the Existing Use Value for Social Housing (EUV-SH) valuations approach, the worst-case scenario combines a host of factors, most prominent among them the impact of applying net-zero costs of £25,000 per property.
This scenario – which also factors in the seven per cent rent cap, a 50 basis points (bps) discount rate, and an increase in management costs and maintenance spend of 10 and 18 per cent respectively – could lead to values dropping by 69.5 per cent in the North East, modelling suggests.
The percentage change relates to projected values at April 2023, compared with values at April 2022.
The next-largest decrease would be 67.5 per cent, in the North West, followed by 66.6 per cent in Yorkshire and the Humber and 50.3 per cent in the Midlands.
Speaking at the Social Housing Annual Conference on 1 December, Richard Petty, head of UK living at JLL, emphasised the modelling was indicative only and not a forecast, and that valuations will vary in practice.
Seven per cent rent cap
Talking through the approach, Mr Petty said his modelling suggested that a seven per cent rent cap on its own next April would lead to a rise in values.
JLL looked at eight actual loan security portfolios that it valued in April or March of this year and will be valued again next April.
Mr Petty’s modelling showed that, on the basis of EUV-SH, values could increase by 1.6 per cent on average.
Under EUV-SH, it is assumed that properties will remain in the sector. The value is calculated by adding up rental income over a 30-year period and taking away the costs. The net figure is then discounted to allow for inflation.
The modelling took into account the seven per cent rent cap, a 10 per cent rise in management costs and 18 per cent increase in maintenance costs.
The figures it gave were: a 3.4 per cent increase in prime London, 3.3 per cent in Greater London, 2.1 per cent in the South East and 0.3 per cent in the South West.
Mr Petty’s modelling showed a 0.4 per cent rise in the Midlands, one per cent for both Yorkshire and the Humber, and the North West and 0.9 per cent for the North East.
However, he said that a “whole host of things”, including working through a COVID backlog of repairs and maintenance, fire safety and retrofitting costs and introducing new tenant satisfaction measures, mean much higher operating costs for providers.
Mr Petty said that all of these add up and suggest “rather more risk” going forward in his valuations, which brings difficult issues and the problem of having to deal with discount rates.
The indicative modelling showed that (on top of the assumed rise in management and maintenance costs), if discount rates increase by 50 bps alongside next year’s seven per cent rent cap, values would fall by about eight to 11 per cent next April, depending on the region.
At the lower end, Yorkshire and the Humber could experience a 7.7 per cent fall, and the South West and South East 11.4 per cent.
If net-zero costs of £25,000 per property were added to the rent cap, values could fall by a range of 19.6 per cent (in Greater London), up to 60.8 per cent (in the North East).
The modelling also considered that, altogether, if both discount rates rise by 50 bps and net-zero costs are factored in, indicative values could drop by 28.6 per cent at the lower end (in Greater London), and up to 69.5 per cent at the higher end (in the North East).
In this worst-case scenario, values could fall by 67.5 per cent in the North West, 66.6 per cent in Yorkshire and the Humber and 50.3 per cent in the Midlands.
Values could fall by 48.2 per cent in the South West, 37.3 in the South East, 31.6 per cent in prime London and 28.6 in Greater London.
Mr Petty said: “When we start seeing some huge falls in value, and possibly as much as 60 per cent, on the EUV-SH numbers, there could be some mitigations, where there is a limit to what we or any valuers can do.
“If we put net-zero carbon costs together with an increase in the discount rates to reflect that increase in the risk and operating environment, we’re looking at sort of 50, 60 or even nearly 70 per cent falls in EUV-SH values.”
Mr Petty said he was setting out to be honest, rather than a “prophet of doom”.
“I think we are dealing with a number of issues that we can’t sweep under the carpet any longer, and decarbonisation is one of those.”
Mr Petty said some mitigations could be brought in to deal with the impact, because a 60 per cent drop in values would be a “disaster”.
He said that if funders allowed valuers to value stock in which the market actually trades, for example, 200 or 300 units at a time, rather than 5,000, valuers can drive out more value.
Mr Petty added that lenders should allow valuers to include affordable rentals in EUV-SH valuations.
“We’ve been grappling with affordable rents for a long time as a sector. The majority of lenders don’t let us include affordable rental in EUV-SH valuations,” he said.
“That’s madness to leave money on the table. It’s about time that funders recognise that affordable rent is here to stay.”
Mr Petty said that Market Value subject to Tenancies (MV-T) values, which used to be more volatile, is predicted to be more resilient than EUV-SH. He added that, this time, there are far greater downside risks to EUV-SH values, which is usually very stable and predictable.
He said that a 25 per cent drop in housing transactions next year while market rents continue to increase could mean MV-T values drop by four to six per cent.
Mr Petty said JLL’s modelling showed that shared ownership valuations may rise by perhaps four or five per cent next year.
He said that while the government has a track record of ripping up long-term rent settlements and changing policy, it had listened to the answers to the rent-cap consultation.
Mr Petty said the government achieved the “best possible outcome”, with the seven per cent rent cap striking “exactly the right balance”.
The government confirmed the seven per cent cap on rent rises for the 2023-24 financial year in its Autumn Statement in November. It previously said it will review social rent policy beyond 2025 through a separate consultation next year.
Mr Petty said that rent policy is currently not fit for purpose, and there was a “fantastic opportunity” for a complete reset, making it financially viable to decarbonise homes.
RELATED