ao link

Special report: the 2020 English Housing Revenue Accounts in detail

Steve Partridge, director of Savills Housing Consultancy, continues his series of analyses of local authorities’ Housing Revenue Accounts with an in-depth look at the 2020 accounts

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Sharelines

Steve Partridge, director of Savills Housing Consultancy, continues his series of analyses of local authorities’ Housing Revenue Accounts with an in-depth look at the 2020 accounts #UKhousing #SocialHousingFinance

Local authorities in England had considerable financial capacity to invest in housing despite the reduction in income caused by the four-year rent cut, our analysis of the 2019/20 Housing Revenue Account (HRA) finances shows.

 

This is the third year of our analysis, which allows us to measure movements over time. The analysis continues to paint a picture of a sector that has capacity to grow.

 

The standout result that the overall net amount of council housing in the whole of the East of England region actually grew in the year to March 2020 – for the first time in what must be about 40 years – is testament to the fact that authorities are beginning to take advantage of the financing opportunities following the abolition of the HRA debt cap in October 2018.

 

The national position for 2019/20

 

The key headlines support a conclusion that, despite an expected tightening of the finances in 2019/20 in the final year of the four-year, one per cent rent cut, authorities have begun to invest, drawing on the latent capacity within the sector. All of the main metrics continue to support a case for additional investment.

 

Our analysis focuses on 161 authorities. This compares to 163 in 2018/19. Two HRA authorities (Bournemouth and Poole) have combined to form part of the new BCP Council. One authority has not published its accounts and we cannot find any supportable evidence for figures, hence we have excluded this authority from 2019/20 and
all previous years to maintain comparability.


Read more

Special report: latest council HRAs show sector is ripe for investmentSpecial report: latest council HRAs show sector is ripe for investment
How will changes to PWLB lending criteria impact council borrowing?How will changes to PWLB lending criteria impact council borrowing?
Are council finances a cause for concern?Are council finances a cause for concern?
Special reports librarySpecial reports library

We continue to exclude Salford and Oldham as PFI-only HRAs, as these tend to distort the analysis.

 

There have been inevitable delays in the publication of the accounts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. There are a small number of councils that have yet to publish their final accounts, but all authorities will be going through their budgeting and planning cycles so we thought it timely to present this analysis. Where possible we have worked with budgeted figures for 2019/20.

 

Net property numbers reduced from 1,573,000 to 1,568,000, a reduction of just 0.35 per cent. This is the lowest reduction in HRA stock nationally since 2012, which saw the extension of discounts for the Right to Buy.

 

Turnover was £8.02bn in 2019/20 compared to £8.07bn in 2018/19, a reduction of 0.6 per cent, entirely in line with the rent cut. Rents reduced from an average £85.61 to £85.09, a similar percentage reduction. Operating costs, which include provision via depreciation for major repairs expenditure, by contrast, rose from £6.13bn to £6.24bn (1.8 per cent), as costs continued to be subject to inflationary pressures, although this increase was substantially less than in the previous year.

 

This combination had the effect of reducing operating margins from £1.93bn to £1.77bn (23.9 per cent to 22.1 per cent) between 2018/19 and 2019/20. Margins are now a little tighter than seen within the housing association sector but continue to maintain healthy surpluses overall. Although not shown in the table, revenue reserves were c.£3.9bn at 31 March 2020.

Following a year of relatively little movement in debt levels in 2018/19, net borrowing rose 1.7 per cent in 2019/20 to £26.52bn from £26.07bn, a per-unit increase of 2.1 per cent to £16,908/unit. This is the biggest net increase in debt since the 2012 settlement and clearly shows that in the first year post debt cap, many authorities had begun to bring forward investment programmes.

 

Overall levels of debt remain well below equivalent levels in the housing association sector.

 

By contrast, asset valuations increased by 2.3 per cent in 2019/20. As we have discussed at length before in these analyses, while asset values are not directly linked to the ability to borrow, and the continued unsuitability of the methodology used to value assets in the HRA, the fact that loan-to-value ratios across the sector as a whole decreased in 2019/20 provides additional evidence that the sector is under-leveraged.

 

Key debt metrics

 

The interest cover ratio (measured as operating surpluses after taking into account major repairs financed from revenue via depreciation) was 1.67 in 2019/20. This represented a tightening from 1.89 the previous year.

 

This is as expected given the reduction in operating margins and net increase in borrowing, yet still remains a position from which local authorities can grow as rent policy loosened from 2020 onwards, and well above the golden rule of minimum 1.25 applying in many local authority investment frameworks.

Local authorities with HRAs (as at 31 March 2020)

Local authorityRegionNumber of unitsAsset value per unit (£)Debt (£000)Debt per unit (£)Turnover (£000)Operating costs (£000)Operating surplus (£000)Operating marginInterest cover ratioDebt to turnover ratio

Adur

SE

2,542

78,975

60,294

23,719

13,744

12,059

1,685

12.26%

0.76

4.39

Arun

SE

3,355

67,801

55,400

16,513

16,883

11,647

5,236

31.01%

3.28

3.28

Ashfield

EM

6,666

34,813

80,081

12,013

24,452

16,005

8,447

34.55%

2.38

3.28

Ashford

SE

5,020

58,684

120,898

24,083

25,440

17,280

8,160

32.08%

2.19

4.75

Babergh

East

3,418

74,077

85,753

25,089

16,936

11,626

5,310

31.35%

1.88

5.06

Barking & Dagenham

Lon

16,960

62,367

291,042

17,160

109,757

85,862

23,895

21.77%

1.95

2.65

Barnet

Lon

9,574

86,888

201,614

21,058

55,999

54,223

1,776

3.17%

0.24

3.60

Barnsley

YH

18,329

33,099

271,734

14,825

71,970

53,952

18,018

25.04%

1.74

3.78

Barrow-in-Furness

NW

2,567

28,600

18,021

7,020

11,669

9,413

2,256

19.33%

2.48

1.54

Basildon

East

10,794

78,371

205,038

18,996

53,502

43,371

10,131

18.94%

1.25

3.83

Bassetlaw

EM

6,655

42,910

95,414

14,337

26,853

19,197

7,656

28.51%

2.05

3.55

Birmingham

WM

60,185

42,599

1,099,653

18,271

278,200

194,700

83,500

30.01%

1.71

3.95

Blackpool

NW

4,736

25,573

4,849

1,024

18,817

15,487

3,330

17.70%

8.35

0.26

Bolsover

EM

5,045

41,427

108,190

21,445

21,185

17,722

3,463

16.35%

0.93

5.11

BCP

SW

9,645

64,020

140,344

14,551

45,983

35,146

10,837

23.57%

1.93

3.05

Brent

Lon

7,794

81,293

159,874

20,512

55,600

38,300

17,300

31.12%

2.62

2.88

Brentwood

East

2,482

108,055

60,766

24,483

12,926

10,208

2,718

21.03%

1.40

4.70

Brighton & Hove

SE

11,566

79,290

129,358

11,184

59,252

42,902

16,350

27.59%

3.21

2.18

Bristol

SW

26,833

64,737

244,568

9,114

119,811

100,078

19,733

16.47%

1.72

2.04

Broxtowe

EM

4,408

41,359

81,330

18,451

16,196

12,545

3,651

22.54%

1.49

5.02

Bury

NW

7,883

30,798

118,784

15,068

30,325

23,215

7,110

23.45%

1.47

3.92

Cambridge

East

7,154

92,759

214,321

29,958

41,538

29,080

12,458

29.99%

1.66

5.16

Camden

Lon

23,216

104,482

484,952

20,889

182,712

162,114

20,598

11.27%

1.39

2.65

Cannock Chase

WM

5,115

39,738

81,039

15,843

20,151

13,472

6,679

33.14%

2.08

4.02

Canterbury

SE

5,095

63,901

83,569

16,402

25,340

18,162

7,178

28.33%

3.32

3.30

Castle Point

East

1,508

86,845

36,418

24,150

7,800

6,499

1,301

16.68%

1.20

4.67

Central Bedfordshire

East

5,355

88,223

190,723

35,616

30,265

24,101

6,164

20.37%

1.49

6.30

Charnwood

EM

5,548

53,474

81,552

14,699

21,832

15,974

5,858

26.83%

2.16

3.74

Cheltenham

SW

4,481

53,759

60,272

13,451

20,168

16,910

3,258

16.15%

1.86

2.99

Cheshire West and Chester

NW

5,478

36,013

96,283

17,576

22,879

13,146

9,733

42.54%

4.11

4.21

Chesterfield

EM

9,008

39,840

130,389

14,475

37,199

28,115

9,084

24.42%

1.90

3.51

City of London

Lon

1,872

147,863

0

0

15,800

20,000

-4,200

-26.58%

0.00

0.00

City of York

YH

7,572

68,767

139,034

18,362

36,623

25,087

11,536

31.50%

2.54

3.80

Colchester

East

5,892

64,033

127,933

21,713

30,135

19,407

10,728

35.60%

1.90

4.25

Corby

EM

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Cornwall

SW

10,234

52,830

117,598

11,491

40,422

34,056

6,366

15.75%

1.61

2.91

Crawley

SE

8,099

75,585

260,325

32,143

48,045

25,826

22,219

46.25%

2.67

5.42

Croydon

Lon

13,465

73,213

338,924

25,171

85,561

66,248

19,313

22.57%

1.61

3.96

Dacorum

East

10,099

111,649

340,518

33,718

55,697

40,067

15,630

28.06%

1.35

6.11

Darlington

NE

5,325

33,008

68,967

12,952

24,528

14,106

10,422

42.49%

4.31

2.81

Dartford

SE

4,239

75,057

55,850

13,175

21,542

12,055

9,487

44.04%

7.06

2.59

Derby

EM

12,691

40,757

231,373

18,231

58,974

49,962

9,012

15.28%

0.88

3.92

Doncaster

YH

20,108

33,590

267,069

13,282

74,974

54,504

20,470

27.30%

1.64

3.56

Dover

SE

4,317

48,293

76,778

17,785

19,552

10,459

9,093

46.51%

3.58

3.93

Dudley

WM

21,517

43,278

470,300

21,857

87,021

69,849

17,172

19.73%

1.00

5.40

Ealing

Lon

11,851

74,169

163,584

13,803

65,486

54,124

11,362

17.35%

1.51

2.50

East Devon

SW

4,170

58,022

80,601

19,329

18,082

12,135

5,947

32.89%

2.35

4.46

East Riding of Yorkshire

YH

11,285

40,924

233,063

20,652

48,229

30,145

18,084

37.50%

2.35

4.83

Eastbourne

SE

3,382

57,790

42,649

12,611

15,355

13,190

2,165

14.10%

1.15

2.78

Enfield

Lon

10,353

71,422

246,435

23,803

89,724

66,610

23,114

25.76%

2.80

2.75

Epping Forest

East

6,421

109,594

146,989

22,892

34,399

25,644

8,755

25.45%

1.53

4.27

Exeter

SW

4,855

56,331

57,882

11,922

19,716

15,510

4,206

21.33%

2.08

2.94

Fareham

SE

2,384

55,166

51,141

21,452

12,268

8,894

3,374

27.50%

1.86

4.17

Gateshead

NE

18,907

38,735

345,505

18,274

79,175

62,862

16,313

20.60%

1.22

4.36

Gosport

SE

3,111

47,619

61,903

19,898

14,753

12,283

2,470

16.74%

1.33

4.20

Gravesham

SE

5,685

58,776

88,665

15,596

28,293

21,055

7,238

25.58%

3.04

3.13

Great Yarmouth

East

5,766

42,359

85,668

14,857

23,318

16,982

6,336

27.17%

2.28

3.67

Greenwich

Lon

21,327

73,014

334,630

15,690

117,835

104,288

13,547

11.50%

0.86

2.84

Guildford

SE

5,228

99,668

197,024

37,686

32,375

18,248

14,127

43.64%

2.74

6.09

Hackney

Lon

21,841

114,156

110,219

5,046

144,451

146,136

-1,685

-1.17%

-0.49

0.76

Hammersmith & Fulham

Lon

12,103

114,609

225,273

18,613

79,482

82,189

-2,707

-3.41%

-0.32

2.83

Haringey

Lon

15,133

95,252

251,899

16,646

101,773

79,837

21,936

21.55%

2.04

2.48

Harlow

East

9,126

81,380

187,370

20,531

47,868

38,009

9,859

20.60%

1.48

3.91

Harrogate

YH

3,863

64,946

60,756

15,728

17,067

12,763

4,304

25.22%

2.60

3.56

Harrow

Lon

4,823

97,168

149,893

31,079

31,829

25,949

5,880

18.47%

0.92

4.71

Havering

Lon

9,128

67,783

197,217

21,606

54,798

38,093

16,705

30.48%

2.85

3.60

High Peak

EM

3,913

45,243

55,859

14,275

15,131

10,149

4,982

32.93%

2.66

3.69

Hillingdon

Lon

10,187

73,638

172,385

16,922

61,645

40,580

21,065

34.17%

2.84

2.80

Hinckley & Bosworth

EM

3,228

54,690

71,915

22,279

13,419

9,870

3,549

26.45%

1.70

5.36

Hounslow

Lon

13,035

81,634

249,356

19,130

89,700

67,800

21,900

24.41%

2.09

2.78

Ipswich

East

7,850

57,464

118,855

15,141

35,734

19,574

16,160

45.22%

4.49

3.33

Islington

Lon

25,240

125,023

445,275

17,642

198,475

169,078

29,397

14.81%

1.23

2.24

Kensington & Chelsea

Lon

6,693

122,684

210,617

31,468

61,663

66,958

-5,295

-8.59%

-0.59

3.42

Kettering

EM

3,625

51,336

64,005

17,657

15,381

10,833

4,548

29.57%

2.44

4.16

Kingston upon Hull

YH

23,578

26,907

242,441

10,283

93,947

58,981

34,966

37.22%

3.56

2.58

Kingston upon Thames

Lon

4,584

85,843

131,411

28,667

31,903

27,701

4,202

13.17%

0.92

4.12

Kirklees

YH

22,229

31,200

233,157

10,489

82,467

68,549

13,918

16.88%

1.16

2.83

Lambeth

Lon

23,973

101,883

406,488

16,956

173,767

145,465

28,302

16.29%

1.22

2.34

Lancaster

NW

3,677

35,741

40,394

10,986

15,609

12,083

3,526

22.59%

1.87

2.59

Leeds

YH

54,684

42,214

826,505

15,114

219,583

153,797

65,786

29.96%

1.72

3.76

Leicester

EM

20,142

50,760

227,084

11,274

79,655

68,736

10,919

13.71%

1.25

2.85

Lewes

SE

3,179

78,559

64,380

20,252

16,021

13,664

2,357

14.71%

1.27

4.02

Lewisham

Lon

13,796

98,015

57,543

4,171

94,887

76,975

17,912

18.88%

2.04

0.61

Lincoln

EM

7,761

36,182

62,369

8,036

28,548

23,833

4,715

16.52%

1.95

2.18

Luton

East

7,789

64,641

134,089

17,215

38,866

34,701

4,165

10.72%

0.87

3.45

Manchester

NW

15,689

36,879

269,245

17,161

61,501

36,552

24,949

40.57%

2.08

4.38

Mansfield

EM

7,400

30,608

77,937

10,532

28,125

20,978

7,147

25.41%

2.58

2.77

Medway

SE

2,992

55,338

41,328

13,813

14,314

10,660

3,654

25.53%

1.77

2.89

Melton

EM

1,801

53,387

31,484

17,481

7,546

5,859

1,687

22.36%

1.44

4.17

Mid Devon

SW

3,001

51,254

40,061

13,349

13,052

9,273

3,779

28.95%

3.38

3.07

Mid Suffolk

East

3,230

68,001

87,370

27,050

15,335

11,545

3,790

24.71%

1.42

5.70

Milton Keynes

SE

11,118

59,621

229,571

20,649

54,933

38,232

16,701

30.40%

2.28

4.18

North East Derbyshire

EM

7,693

47,137

175,490

22,812

31,826

21,147

10,679

33.55%

2.08

5.51

New Forest

SE

5,120

73,680

142,039

27,742

28,002

20,084

7,918

28.28%

1.82

5.07

Newark & Sherwood

EM

5,497

55,232

101,298

18,428

24,433

13,842

10,591

43.35%

2.45

4.15

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE

25,110

35,716

389,385

15,507

109,743

93,930

15,813

14.41%

0.95

3.55

Newham

Lon

15,928

87,843

208,914

13,116

101,427

77,750

23,677

23.34%

0.40

2.06

North Kesteven

EM

3,842

41,618

71,224

18,538

15,671

10,462

5,209

33.24%

2.40

4.54

North Tyneside

NE

14,556

45,369

339,341

23,313

61,692

34,028

27,664

44.84%

1.88

5.50

North Warwickshire

WM

2,631

58,732

49,889

18,962

11,871

8,087

3,784

31.88%

2.46

4.20

Northampton

EM

11,426

51,236

202,786

17,748

51,953

44,616

7,337

14.12%

1.22

3.90

Northumberland

YH

8,442

38,402

105,145

12,455

31,062

26,374

4,688

15.09%

1.23

3.39

Norwich

East

14,657

55,235

205,717

14,035

67,573

50,849

16,724

24.75%

2.29

3.04

Nottingham

EM

25,388

41,301

304,742

12,003

106,524

81,247

25,277

23.73%

1.75

2.86

Nuneaton & Bedworth

WM

5,703

37,769

79,173

13,883

25,786

23,189

2,597

10.07%

1.27

3.07

North West Leicestershire

EM

4,196

59,313

72,865

17,365

17,709

10,132

7,577

42.79%

3.39

4.11

Oadby & Wigston

EM

1,202

53,030

20,554

17,100

4,950

4,407

543

10.97%

0.99

4.15

Oxford

SE

7,669

93,109

208,219

27,151

45,458

31,947

13,511

29.72%

1.75

4.58

Portsmouth

SE

14,543

46,130

176,156

12,113

83,203

81,874

1,329

1.60%

0.23

2.12

Reading

SE

6,710

72,159

197,341

29,410

35,931

22,274

13,657

38.01%

1.33

5.49

Redbridge

Lon

4,442

72,132

75,138

16,915

29,460

21,336

8,124

27.58%

3.42

2.55

Redditch

WM

5,685

53,160

122,158

21,488

24,208

21,887

2,321

9.59%

0.55

5.05

Richmondshire

YH

1,499

45,436

18,217

12,153

6,268

5,144

1,124

17.93%

2.58

2.91

Rotherham

YH

20,185

35,099

304,125

15,067

83,941

63,376

20,565

24.50%

1.51

3.62

Rugby

WM

3,789

53,422

61,632

16,266

16,393

13,248

3,145

19.19%

2.09

3.76

Runnymede

SE

2,881

104,623

101,956

35,389

16,636

11,239

5,397

32.44%

1.60

6.13

Sandwell

WM

28,442

40,739

466,434

16,399

119,589

79,217

40,372

33.76%

2.04

3.90

Sedgemoor

SW

4,043

35,536

56,478

13,969

17,740

15,092

2,648

14.93%

1.56

3.18

Selby

YH

3,026

53,490

53,850

17,796

12,148

7,084

5,064

41.69%

2.10

4.43

Sheffield

YH

38,989

36,237

345,969

8,874

149,994

119,863

30,131

20.09%

2.31

2.31

Shepway

SE

3,377

51,175

47,417

14,041

16,203

11,029

5,174

31.93%

3.30

2.93

Shropshire

WM

4,049

49,922

84,595

20,893

18,366

13,581

4,785

26.05%

1.60

4.61

Slough

SE

6,066

96,591

154,691

25,501

35,602

28,512

7,090

19.91%

1.27

4.35

Solihull

WM

9,868

46,227

174,737

17,707

44,052

32,806

11,246

25.53%

1.54

3.97

South Cambridgeshire

East

5,199

95,402

205,123

39,454

27,986

16,521

11,465

40.97%

1.59

7.33

South Derbyshire

EM

2,970

43,037

60,084

20,230

12,399

9,630

2,769

22.33%

1.73

4.85

South Holland

EM

3,779

46,075

68,609

18,155

15,962

10,724

5,238

32.82%

2.23

4.30

South Kesteven

EM

5,971

41,283

106,070

17,764

24,743

17,924

6,819

27.56%

2.50

4.29

South Tyneside

NE

16,516

35,282

287,503

17,408

66,583

55,208

11,375

17.08%

1.04

4.32

Southampton

SE

15,843

43,432

172,236

10,871

79,022

61,314

17,708

22.41%

3.41

2.18

Southend-on-Sea

East

6,020

68,716

98,740

16,402

27,561

19,949

7,612

27.62%

2.24

3.58

Southwark

Lon

37,147

92,288

449,357

12,097

264,407

228,074

36,333

13.74%

1.57

1.70

St Albans

East

4,909

115,255

166,416

33,900

28,524

19,433

9,091

31.87%

1.90

5.83

Stevenage

East

7,990

79,073

214,873

26,893

43,115

31,306

11,809

27.39%

1.72

4.98

Stockport

NW

11,122

42,001

146,266

13,151

53,705

47,605

6,100

11.36%

1.07

2.72

Stoke-on-Trent

WM

17,723

32,140

156,641

8,838

66,541

62,500

4,041

6.07%

0.62

2.35

Stroud

SW

4,991

55,236

94,842

19,003

23,263

18,789

4,474

19.23%

1.32

4.08

Sutton

Lon

5,996

71,550

192,016

32,024

37,478

23,360

14,118

37.67%

2.16

5.12

Swindon

SW

10,281

47,129

114,016

11,090

50,655

36,304

14,351

28.33%

3.97

2.25

Tamworth

WM

4,280

46,528

68,532

16,012

20,942

12,464

8,478

40.48%

3.20

3.27

Tandridge

SE

2,620

126,670

64,525

24,628

14,738

12,302

2,436

16.53%

1.44

4.38

Taunton Deane

SW

5,744

53,934

109,804

19,116

26,737

22,520

4,217

15.77%

1.61

4.11

Tendring

East

3,978

33,448

41,770

10,500

13,565

11,931

1,634

12.05%

1.17

3.08

Thanet

SE

3,019

53,858

25,040

8,294

13,823

10,484

3,339

24.16%

4.65

1.81

Thurrock

East

9,799

78,522

191,292

19,522

54,795

49,277

5,518

10.07%

0.94

3.49

Tower Hamlets

Lon

11,477

107,770

83,293

7,257

98,165

89,323

8,842

9.01%

2.47

0.85

Uttlesford

East

2,810

111,765

84,622

30,115

15,938

11,445

4,493

28.19%

1.71

5.31

Waltham Forest

Lon

9,991

90,918

200,631

20,081

61,630

42,909

18,721

30.38%

1.98

3.26

Wandsworth

Lon

17,213

91,688

330,599

19,206

143,213

110,955

32,258

22.52%

7.81

2.31

Warwick

WM

5,477

75,947

135,787

24,792

28,099

21,187

6,912

24.60%

1.45

4.83

Waveney

East

4,453

49,697

77,377

17,376

20,659

14,011

6,648

32.18%

2.94

3.75

Waverley

SE

5,567

79,519

188,700

33,896

29,474

17,968

11,506

39.04%

2.03

6.40

Wealden

SE

2,987

72,256

70,275

23,527

15,239

12,816

2,423

15.90%

1.29

4.61

Welwyn Hatfield

East

9,018

113,252

273,433

30,321

52,573

37,148

15,425

29.34%

2.45

5.20

West Lancashire

NW

5,895

29,325

82,054

13,919

25,271

17,370

7,901

31.27%

2.58

3.25

Westminster

Lon

11,837

140,940

261,283

22,073

108,850

93,222

15,628

14.36%

1.56

2.40

Wigan

NW

21,676

27,199

315,000

14,532

88,143

75,903

12,240

13.89%

0.85

3.57

Wiltshire

SW

5,307

56,389

123,297

23,233

26,218

21,129

5,089

19.41%

1.42

4.70

Winchester

SE

5,094

87,208

164,022

32,199

29,836

21,265

8,571

28.73%

1.66

5.50

Woking

SE

3,331

87,577

135,881

40,793

18,835

11,910

6,925

36.77%

1.40

7.21

Wokingham

SE

2,632

84,857

88,324

33,558

14,800

10,034

4,766

32.20%

1.75

5.97

Wolverhampton

WM

21,940

38,464

253,256

11,543

95,700

65,600

30,100

31.45%

3.10

2.65

Total

1,568,237

61,533

26,515,946

16,908

8,016,342

6,242,976

1,773,366

22.12%

1.67

3.31

The weighted average cost of capital recorded in HRAs increased slightly from 3.9 per cent to 4.0 per cent – perhaps as a result of the refinancing of existing loans in preparation for lower future rates going forward.

 

Loan-to-value ratios reduced slightly from 28 per cent to 27 per cent as asset valuation strengthened. This continues to represent a very low result compared to housing associations, and one that strongly suggests that a review of the current region-based valuation methodology is long overdue – it is simply no longer fit for purpose for a post-debt-cap HRA.

 

Debt to turnover ratios increased slightly from 3.2 to 3.3, still below the housing association sector equivalent.

 

The national position over time

 

We have now undertaken this analysis for three full financial years, from 2017 to 2020, and some key trends over time are emerging.

 

Property numbers have reduced by a net 1.1 per cent between 2017/18 and 2019/20, while turnover has reduced 3.0 per cent and operating costs have risen 4.4 per cent. Debt is up 3.1 per cent per unit over the two years. Behind these consolidated movements is a more nuanced story.

 

The changes in turnover and operating costs were actually more pronounced between 2017/18 and 2018/19 – a period when spending decisions were taken before the announcement of the removal of the debt cap and the sector was still in the throes of the rent cut when the focus of authorities was to manage risk driven by reducing income.



In the first full year after the debt cap, the reduction in turnover slowed, as did the increase in operating costs, with borrowing for investment beginning to increase. Hence, as the charts show, the reduction in interest cover slowed in 2019/20, driven by a slowing reduction in operating margins.

 

Taken together, these show a sector characterised by resilience, which has responded by managing the consolidated reduction in income driven by four years of the rent cut, through control of operating costs so that after the debt cap was removed, there are clear signs that authorities had begun to respond to the incentive to invest.

 

The regional position

 

Behind the national position lies significant variation at the authority level, and a look at the table showing the regional split for some key measures between 2018/19 and 2019/20 offers some insight into the trends locally.

 

London HRAs continue to offer a major contrast to the other regions, with higher rents, lower operating margins and the lowest interest cover of all regions. The reduction in interest cover in London is particularly marked, a drop of 0.44 compared to an average drop of 0.16 in the other regions where interest cover has tightened, and an actual increase in interest cover in the South East and Yorkshire and the Humber.

 

The South West, the South East and the East of England continue to offer significant capacity to invest with a slight net reduction of interest cover across these three regions, but still averaging close to 2.0.

 

Net reductions across the Midlands and northern regions were very similar, with average interest cover across these five regions around the national average.



Operating margins decreased as expected across all regions, with above-average reductions in London, the East of England, the South West and the East Midlands.

 

Perhaps the most startling statistic in the regional table is the net increase in stock in the East of England between years. In the face of continued high levels of Right to Buy discounts, local authorities across that region (like many across the country) have begun to arrest decades of net decline, achieved with only a modest increase in borrowing per unit of 0.8 per cent.

 

Unit operating costs position

 

Turnover per unit has reduced by 1.9 per cent (£5,211 to £5,112) between 2017/18 and 2019/20, while operating costs per unit have increased 5.6 per cent over the same period (£3,769 to £3,981), resulting in a reduction in operating surpluses of around a fifth. These are entirely within expectations given the challenges posed by the policy and operating environment prior to the abolition of the debt cap.

 

It is also interesting to begin to analyse these measures at a regional level. There is considerable variation around the average unit turnover of £5,112 – with London authorities on average clear outliers with turnover/unit above £7,000. This is 75 per cent higher than the equivalent unit turnover in Yorkshire and the Humber authorities, while other regions are much more closely settled around the non-London average.

 

This is matched by similar trends in unit operating costs, with the London authorities well above the national average of £3,981 at nearly £5,900 per unit. What is particularly interesting is how these gross measures convert into operating surpluses per unit. Surpluses in London were in fact exactly the national average for the year, while the South West, the East Midlands and the North West showed lower unit surpluses and the East and the South East showed stronger unit surpluses.



It will be interesting to see how these unit income and expenditure measures compare to the housing association sector. With the impending change to more proactive regulation of local authorities, we might expect to see more focus on the way that authorities raise income and spend on services and their stock.

 

While much of the focus since the removal of the debt cap (and in this summary) has been on the capacity for investment, the analysis also provides a strong platform for beginning to understand more around what this says about the way that local authorities spend on services and existing stock, and many may be looking at drawing on investment capacity for major investment in areas such as building safety and net zero carbon.

 

One thing we are able to predict confidently is that both unit turnover and costs for local authorities will be well below housing associations, even adjusting for VAT. While it is tempting to jump to generalisations, the picture will of course be more complex and more localised.

Regional totals for local authorities with HRAs (as at 31 March 2020)

Regions

Number of units

Unit % change

Debt per unit (£)

Debt / unit change

Average rents (£)

Operating margin (2018/19)

Operating margin (2019/20)

Interest cover ratio (2018/19)

Interest cover ratio (2019/20)

Turnover per unit (£)

Operating costs per unit (£)

Operating surplus per unit (£)

London

390,979

-0.25%

16,957

4.0%

104.57

18.1%

16.1%

1.80

1.36

7,027

5,897

1,131

East of England

155,717

0.55%

22,998

0.8%

88.60

29.7%

25.6%

2.00

1.74

5,116

3,806

1,310

South East

168,771

-0.16%

21,070

1.2%

91.29

28.0%

27.2%

2.01

2.06

5,303

3,861

1,441

South West

93,585

-0.15%

13,247

2.1%

78.44

22.6%

20.1%

2.24

1.96

4,508

3,600

907

East Midlands

169,855

-0.11%

15,205

1.8%

73.43

27.3%

23.8%

2.05

1.78

4,125

3,143

982

West Midlands

196,404

-0.72%

16,822

1.2%

77.64

28.0%

26.3%

1.80

1.70

4,363

3,217

1,146

Yorkshire and the Humber

233,789

-0.99%

13,264

1.3%

71.29

26.0%

26.8%

1.89

1.91

3,971

2,907

1,064

North West

78,723

-0.60%

13,857

1.6%

72.75

24.3%

23.5%

1.90

1.69

4,165

3,186

980

North East

80,414

-0.69%

17,792

2.1%

73.35

25.4%

23.9%

1.47

1.41

4,250

3,235

1,015

Nationwide

1,568,237

-0.35%

16,908

2.1%

85.09

23.9%

22.1%

1.89

1.67

5,112

3,981

1,131

Summary

 

Our analysis of the 2019/20 finances shows a resilient sector that has coped well with four years of rent cuts and that is beginning to put in place plans for growth. While all the main metrics have tightened, authorities used the first full year after the abolition of the debt cap to begin to invest. In fact, despite COVID-19 challenges, the capacity for increased investment remains strong and significant, on any key measure.

 

Taking operating margin and interest cover together, if authorities continue to implement Consumer Price Index (CPI) plus one per cent rent increases to April 2024, and unit operating costs are able to be held to CPI increases, operating margins would strengthen to 27 per cent by 2024/25 and interest cover against existing debt levels would rise to 2.4.

 

In turn this would convert into borrowing capacity above the minimum 1.25 golden rule of c.£16bn at a national level – even at prevailing average interest rates of about four per cent. When we factor in the ability to borrow at current Public Works Loan Board rates, this additional capacity rises further – perhaps as much as £18bn.

 

The picture therefore continues to be one of the potential for growth. Of course the sector rightly argues the need for substantial additional subsidy for councils to bring about a true renaissance in council housebuilding. However, the capacity for HRAs themselves to contribute demonstrates that local authorities are in a strong position to respond positively.

Social Housing special reports

Social Housing special reports

Each month Social Housing focuses on a specific aspect of housing finance and collates and scrutinises the data for hundreds of housing organisations.

 

The reports below contain unparalleled commentary and analysis along with detailed sortable and searchable data tables.

 

 

Unit costs 2019 Our analysis of data from the English regulator has found that unit costs have risen among all types of housing association, with overall maintenance costs seeing the highest weighted average increase of nearly seven per cent

 

Impairment 2019 Housing associations’ impairments rise almost 40% in a year, driven by fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values

 

Global accounts 2018/19 Housing associations’ surplus for the year before tax decreased by five per cent to £3.76bn, driven by a 6.6 per cent drop in England

 

Affordable rent profile 2018/19 The level of affordable lettings dropped for the third year in a row

 

Staff pay Data from audited accounts of 206 housing associations shows that average staff pay in 2018/19 was £31,787 – a rise of 3.2 per cent over a 12-month period

 

Professionals’ league Our exclusive professionals’ league finds that activity continued apace in 2019, when housing associations increasingly looked to private placements

 

Sales proceeds Despite a 10 per cent rise in housing associations’ income from development sales in the last financial year, sales revenue is likely to remain flat over the coming years as a result of the property market downturn

 

Capital commitments The total capital commitments of 200 housing associations rose by 15 per cent in the past year, analysis by Social Housing has found

 

Reliance on sales surplus Social Housing finds that the total sales surplus of 150 English registered providers has dropped by nearly 10 per cent, as a result of lower market sales surplus

 

Stock dispersal How many council areas does your housing association operate in? How concentrated is its stock?

 

Accounts digest 2018/19 How does your housing association’s finances compare to others?

 

Housing Revenue Account part two How do councils compare in their 2018/19 Housing Revenue Account positions? Steve Partridge of Savills takes an in-depth look

 

Diversification of income We look at how housing associations are diversifying their income, and finds that they made 10.3 per cent more revenue from shared ownership and non-social housing activity

 

Impairment 2017/18 Social Housing takes a close look at the accounts of the 130 largest housing associations, and finds that impairments rose by nearly a third to £78.4m in 2018

 

Global accounts Social Housing’s analysis of the sector’s global accounts finds that housing associations’ pre-tax surplus fell last year – driven by drops in England, Scotland and Wales (August 2019)

 

Affordable rent profile We find that the number of affordable rent lettings recorded last year by housing associations in England has dropped for the second year in a row, suggesting that the sector is shifting away from the tenure

 

Capital commitments We scrutinise the capital commitments of the 208 largest housing associations in the UK (June 2019)

 

Housing Revenue Account part one Steve Partridge of Savills takes a look at the financial factors councils should consider in their Housing Revenue Account business planning (May 2019)

 

Reliance on sales surplus Our analysis reveals that profits form 42 per cent of 150 English housing associations’ total surplus (April 2019)

 

Sales proceeds We look at housing associations’ build-for-sale income and find a two per cent increase in 2017/18 (March 2019)

 

Shared ownership sales England, excluding London, has seen a four per cent rise in shared ownership sales – much lower than last year’s 16 per cent increase (February 2019)

 

Stock dispersal We show that housing associations’ general needs stock is becoming more concentrated within their local authority areas (January 2019)

 

Click here to find more special reports

Sign up for Social Housing’s weekly news bulletin

Picture: Alamy
Picture: Alamy

 

New to Social Housing? Click here to register and receive our weekly news bulletin straight to your inbox

 

Social Housing’s weekly news bulletin delivers the latest news and insight across finance and funding, regulation and governance, policy and strategy, straight to your inbox. Meanwhile, news alerts bring you the biggest stories as they land. 

 

Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters.

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.

RELATED