Steve Partridge, director of Savills Housing Consultancy, continues his series of analyses of local authorities’ Housing Revenue Accounts with an in-depth look at the 2020 accounts
Local authorities in England had considerable financial capacity to invest in housing despite the reduction in income caused by the four-year rent cut, our analysis of the 2019/20 Housing Revenue Account (HRA) finances shows.
This is the third year of our analysis, which allows us to measure movements over time. The analysis continues to paint a picture of a sector that has capacity to grow.
The standout result that the overall net amount of council housing in the whole of the East of England region actually grew in the year to March 2020 – for the first time in what must be about 40 years – is testament to the fact that authorities are beginning to take advantage of the financing opportunities following the abolition of the HRA debt cap in October 2018.
The national position for 2019/20
The key headlines support a conclusion that, despite an expected tightening of the finances in 2019/20 in the final year of the four-year, one per cent rent cut, authorities have begun to invest, drawing on the latent capacity within the sector. All of the main metrics continue to support a case for additional investment.
Our analysis focuses on 161 authorities. This compares to 163 in 2018/19. Two HRA authorities (Bournemouth and Poole) have combined to form part of the new BCP Council. One authority has not published its accounts and we cannot find any supportable evidence for figures, hence we have excluded this authority from 2019/20 and
all previous years to maintain comparability.
We continue to exclude Salford and Oldham as PFI-only HRAs, as these tend to distort the analysis.
There have been inevitable delays in the publication of the accounts caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. There are a small number of councils that have yet to publish their final accounts, but all authorities will be going through their budgeting and planning cycles so we thought it timely to present this analysis. Where possible we have worked with budgeted figures for 2019/20.
Net property numbers reduced from 1,573,000 to 1,568,000, a reduction of just 0.35 per cent. This is the lowest reduction in HRA stock nationally since 2012, which saw the extension of discounts for the Right to Buy.
Turnover was £8.02bn in 2019/20 compared to £8.07bn in 2018/19, a reduction of 0.6 per cent, entirely in line with the rent cut. Rents reduced from an average £85.61 to £85.09, a similar percentage reduction. Operating costs, which include provision via depreciation for major repairs expenditure, by contrast, rose from £6.13bn to £6.24bn (1.8 per cent), as costs continued to be subject to inflationary pressures, although this increase was substantially less than in the previous year.
This combination had the effect of reducing operating margins from £1.93bn to £1.77bn (23.9 per cent to 22.1 per cent) between 2018/19 and 2019/20. Margins are now a little tighter than seen within the housing association sector but continue to maintain healthy surpluses overall. Although not shown in the table, revenue reserves were c.£3.9bn at 31 March 2020.
Following a year of relatively little movement in debt levels in 2018/19, net borrowing rose 1.7 per cent in 2019/20 to £26.52bn from £26.07bn, a per-unit increase of 2.1 per cent to £16,908/unit. This is the biggest net increase in debt since the 2012 settlement and clearly shows that in the first year post debt cap, many authorities had begun to bring forward investment programmes.
Overall levels of debt remain well below equivalent levels in the housing association sector.
By contrast, asset valuations increased by 2.3 per cent in 2019/20. As we have discussed at length before in these analyses, while asset values are not directly linked to the ability to borrow, and the continued unsuitability of the methodology used to value assets in the HRA, the fact that loan-to-value ratios across the sector as a whole decreased in 2019/20 provides additional evidence that the sector is under-leveraged.
Key debt metrics
The interest cover ratio (measured as operating surpluses after taking into account major repairs financed from revenue via depreciation) was 1.67 in 2019/20. This represented a tightening from 1.89 the previous year.
This is as expected given the reduction in operating margins and net increase in borrowing, yet still remains a position from which local authorities can grow as rent policy loosened from 2020 onwards, and well above the golden rule of minimum 1.25 applying in many local authority investment frameworks.
Local authority | Region | Number of units | Asset value per unit (£) | Debt (£000) | Debt per unit (£) | Turnover (£000) | Operating costs (£000) | Operating surplus (£000) | Operating margin | Interest cover ratio | Debt to turnover ratio |
Adur | SE | 2,542 | 78,975 | 60,294 | 23,719 | 13,744 | 12,059 | 1,685 | 12.26% | 0.76 | 4.39 |
Arun | SE | 3,355 | 67,801 | 55,400 | 16,513 | 16,883 | 11,647 | 5,236 | 31.01% | 3.28 | 3.28 |
Ashfield | EM | 6,666 | 34,813 | 80,081 | 12,013 | 24,452 | 16,005 | 8,447 | 34.55% | 2.38 | 3.28 |
Ashford | SE | 5,020 | 58,684 | 120,898 | 24,083 | 25,440 | 17,280 | 8,160 | 32.08% | 2.19 | 4.75 |
Babergh | East | 3,418 | 74,077 | 85,753 | 25,089 | 16,936 | 11,626 | 5,310 | 31.35% | 1.88 | 5.06 |
Barking & Dagenham | Lon | 16,960 | 62,367 | 291,042 | 17,160 | 109,757 | 85,862 | 23,895 | 21.77% | 1.95 | 2.65 |
Barnet | Lon | 9,574 | 86,888 | 201,614 | 21,058 | 55,999 | 54,223 | 1,776 | 3.17% | 0.24 | 3.60 |
Barnsley | YH | 18,329 | 33,099 | 271,734 | 14,825 | 71,970 | 53,952 | 18,018 | 25.04% | 1.74 | 3.78 |
Barrow-in-Furness | NW | 2,567 | 28,600 | 18,021 | 7,020 | 11,669 | 9,413 | 2,256 | 19.33% | 2.48 | 1.54 |
Basildon | East | 10,794 | 78,371 | 205,038 | 18,996 | 53,502 | 43,371 | 10,131 | 18.94% | 1.25 | 3.83 |
Bassetlaw | EM | 6,655 | 42,910 | 95,414 | 14,337 | 26,853 | 19,197 | 7,656 | 28.51% | 2.05 | 3.55 |
Birmingham | WM | 60,185 | 42,599 | 1,099,653 | 18,271 | 278,200 | 194,700 | 83,500 | 30.01% | 1.71 | 3.95 |
Blackpool | NW | 4,736 | 25,573 | 4,849 | 1,024 | 18,817 | 15,487 | 3,330 | 17.70% | 8.35 | 0.26 |
Bolsover | EM | 5,045 | 41,427 | 108,190 | 21,445 | 21,185 | 17,722 | 3,463 | 16.35% | 0.93 | 5.11 |
BCP | SW | 9,645 | 64,020 | 140,344 | 14,551 | 45,983 | 35,146 | 10,837 | 23.57% | 1.93 | 3.05 |
Brent | Lon | 7,794 | 81,293 | 159,874 | 20,512 | 55,600 | 38,300 | 17,300 | 31.12% | 2.62 | 2.88 |
Brentwood | East | 2,482 | 108,055 | 60,766 | 24,483 | 12,926 | 10,208 | 2,718 | 21.03% | 1.40 | 4.70 |
Brighton & Hove | SE | 11,566 | 79,290 | 129,358 | 11,184 | 59,252 | 42,902 | 16,350 | 27.59% | 3.21 | 2.18 |
Bristol | SW | 26,833 | 64,737 | 244,568 | 9,114 | 119,811 | 100,078 | 19,733 | 16.47% | 1.72 | 2.04 |
Broxtowe | EM | 4,408 | 41,359 | 81,330 | 18,451 | 16,196 | 12,545 | 3,651 | 22.54% | 1.49 | 5.02 |
Bury | NW | 7,883 | 30,798 | 118,784 | 15,068 | 30,325 | 23,215 | 7,110 | 23.45% | 1.47 | 3.92 |
Cambridge | East | 7,154 | 92,759 | 214,321 | 29,958 | 41,538 | 29,080 | 12,458 | 29.99% | 1.66 | 5.16 |
Camden | Lon | 23,216 | 104,482 | 484,952 | 20,889 | 182,712 | 162,114 | 20,598 | 11.27% | 1.39 | 2.65 |
Cannock Chase | WM | 5,115 | 39,738 | 81,039 | 15,843 | 20,151 | 13,472 | 6,679 | 33.14% | 2.08 | 4.02 |
Canterbury | SE | 5,095 | 63,901 | 83,569 | 16,402 | 25,340 | 18,162 | 7,178 | 28.33% | 3.32 | 3.30 |
Castle Point | East | 1,508 | 86,845 | 36,418 | 24,150 | 7,800 | 6,499 | 1,301 | 16.68% | 1.20 | 4.67 |
Central Bedfordshire | East | 5,355 | 88,223 | 190,723 | 35,616 | 30,265 | 24,101 | 6,164 | 20.37% | 1.49 | 6.30 |
Charnwood | EM | 5,548 | 53,474 | 81,552 | 14,699 | 21,832 | 15,974 | 5,858 | 26.83% | 2.16 | 3.74 |
Cheltenham | SW | 4,481 | 53,759 | 60,272 | 13,451 | 20,168 | 16,910 | 3,258 | 16.15% | 1.86 | 2.99 |
Cheshire West and Chester | NW | 5,478 | 36,013 | 96,283 | 17,576 | 22,879 | 13,146 | 9,733 | 42.54% | 4.11 | 4.21 |
Chesterfield | EM | 9,008 | 39,840 | 130,389 | 14,475 | 37,199 | 28,115 | 9,084 | 24.42% | 1.90 | 3.51 |
City of London | Lon | 1,872 | 147,863 | 0 | 0 | 15,800 | 20,000 | -4,200 | -26.58% | 0.00 | 0.00 |
City of York | YH | 7,572 | 68,767 | 139,034 | 18,362 | 36,623 | 25,087 | 11,536 | 31.50% | 2.54 | 3.80 |
Colchester | East | 5,892 | 64,033 | 127,933 | 21,713 | 30,135 | 19,407 | 10,728 | 35.60% | 1.90 | 4.25 |
Corby | EM | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cornwall | SW | 10,234 | 52,830 | 117,598 | 11,491 | 40,422 | 34,056 | 6,366 | 15.75% | 1.61 | 2.91 |
Crawley | SE | 8,099 | 75,585 | 260,325 | 32,143 | 48,045 | 25,826 | 22,219 | 46.25% | 2.67 | 5.42 |
Croydon | Lon | 13,465 | 73,213 | 338,924 | 25,171 | 85,561 | 66,248 | 19,313 | 22.57% | 1.61 | 3.96 |
Dacorum | East | 10,099 | 111,649 | 340,518 | 33,718 | 55,697 | 40,067 | 15,630 | 28.06% | 1.35 | 6.11 |
Darlington | NE | 5,325 | 33,008 | 68,967 | 12,952 | 24,528 | 14,106 | 10,422 | 42.49% | 4.31 | 2.81 |
Dartford | SE | 4,239 | 75,057 | 55,850 | 13,175 | 21,542 | 12,055 | 9,487 | 44.04% | 7.06 | 2.59 |
Derby | EM | 12,691 | 40,757 | 231,373 | 18,231 | 58,974 | 49,962 | 9,012 | 15.28% | 0.88 | 3.92 |
Doncaster | YH | 20,108 | 33,590 | 267,069 | 13,282 | 74,974 | 54,504 | 20,470 | 27.30% | 1.64 | 3.56 |
Dover | SE | 4,317 | 48,293 | 76,778 | 17,785 | 19,552 | 10,459 | 9,093 | 46.51% | 3.58 | 3.93 |
Dudley | WM | 21,517 | 43,278 | 470,300 | 21,857 | 87,021 | 69,849 | 17,172 | 19.73% | 1.00 | 5.40 |
Ealing | Lon | 11,851 | 74,169 | 163,584 | 13,803 | 65,486 | 54,124 | 11,362 | 17.35% | 1.51 | 2.50 |
East Devon | SW | 4,170 | 58,022 | 80,601 | 19,329 | 18,082 | 12,135 | 5,947 | 32.89% | 2.35 | 4.46 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | YH | 11,285 | 40,924 | 233,063 | 20,652 | 48,229 | 30,145 | 18,084 | 37.50% | 2.35 | 4.83 |
Eastbourne | SE | 3,382 | 57,790 | 42,649 | 12,611 | 15,355 | 13,190 | 2,165 | 14.10% | 1.15 | 2.78 |
Enfield | Lon | 10,353 | 71,422 | 246,435 | 23,803 | 89,724 | 66,610 | 23,114 | 25.76% | 2.80 | 2.75 |
Epping Forest | East | 6,421 | 109,594 | 146,989 | 22,892 | 34,399 | 25,644 | 8,755 | 25.45% | 1.53 | 4.27 |
Exeter | SW | 4,855 | 56,331 | 57,882 | 11,922 | 19,716 | 15,510 | 4,206 | 21.33% | 2.08 | 2.94 |
Fareham | SE | 2,384 | 55,166 | 51,141 | 21,452 | 12,268 | 8,894 | 3,374 | 27.50% | 1.86 | 4.17 |
Gateshead | NE | 18,907 | 38,735 | 345,505 | 18,274 | 79,175 | 62,862 | 16,313 | 20.60% | 1.22 | 4.36 |
Gosport | SE | 3,111 | 47,619 | 61,903 | 19,898 | 14,753 | 12,283 | 2,470 | 16.74% | 1.33 | 4.20 |
Gravesham | SE | 5,685 | 58,776 | 88,665 | 15,596 | 28,293 | 21,055 | 7,238 | 25.58% | 3.04 | 3.13 |
Great Yarmouth | East | 5,766 | 42,359 | 85,668 | 14,857 | 23,318 | 16,982 | 6,336 | 27.17% | 2.28 | 3.67 |
Greenwich | Lon | 21,327 | 73,014 | 334,630 | 15,690 | 117,835 | 104,288 | 13,547 | 11.50% | 0.86 | 2.84 |
Guildford | SE | 5,228 | 99,668 | 197,024 | 37,686 | 32,375 | 18,248 | 14,127 | 43.64% | 2.74 | 6.09 |
Hackney | Lon | 21,841 | 114,156 | 110,219 | 5,046 | 144,451 | 146,136 | -1,685 | -1.17% | -0.49 | 0.76 |
Hammersmith & Fulham | Lon | 12,103 | 114,609 | 225,273 | 18,613 | 79,482 | 82,189 | -2,707 | -3.41% | -0.32 | 2.83 |
Haringey | Lon | 15,133 | 95,252 | 251,899 | 16,646 | 101,773 | 79,837 | 21,936 | 21.55% | 2.04 | 2.48 |
Harlow | East | 9,126 | 81,380 | 187,370 | 20,531 | 47,868 | 38,009 | 9,859 | 20.60% | 1.48 | 3.91 |
Harrogate | YH | 3,863 | 64,946 | 60,756 | 15,728 | 17,067 | 12,763 | 4,304 | 25.22% | 2.60 | 3.56 |
Harrow | Lon | 4,823 | 97,168 | 149,893 | 31,079 | 31,829 | 25,949 | 5,880 | 18.47% | 0.92 | 4.71 |
Havering | Lon | 9,128 | 67,783 | 197,217 | 21,606 | 54,798 | 38,093 | 16,705 | 30.48% | 2.85 | 3.60 |
High Peak | EM | 3,913 | 45,243 | 55,859 | 14,275 | 15,131 | 10,149 | 4,982 | 32.93% | 2.66 | 3.69 |
Hillingdon | Lon | 10,187 | 73,638 | 172,385 | 16,922 | 61,645 | 40,580 | 21,065 | 34.17% | 2.84 | 2.80 |
Hinckley & Bosworth | EM | 3,228 | 54,690 | 71,915 | 22,279 | 13,419 | 9,870 | 3,549 | 26.45% | 1.70 | 5.36 |
Hounslow | Lon | 13,035 | 81,634 | 249,356 | 19,130 | 89,700 | 67,800 | 21,900 | 24.41% | 2.09 | 2.78 |
Ipswich | East | 7,850 | 57,464 | 118,855 | 15,141 | 35,734 | 19,574 | 16,160 | 45.22% | 4.49 | 3.33 |
Islington | Lon | 25,240 | 125,023 | 445,275 | 17,642 | 198,475 | 169,078 | 29,397 | 14.81% | 1.23 | 2.24 |
Kensington & Chelsea | Lon | 6,693 | 122,684 | 210,617 | 31,468 | 61,663 | 66,958 | -5,295 | -8.59% | -0.59 | 3.42 |
Kettering | EM | 3,625 | 51,336 | 64,005 | 17,657 | 15,381 | 10,833 | 4,548 | 29.57% | 2.44 | 4.16 |
Kingston upon Hull | YH | 23,578 | 26,907 | 242,441 | 10,283 | 93,947 | 58,981 | 34,966 | 37.22% | 3.56 | 2.58 |
Kingston upon Thames | Lon | 4,584 | 85,843 | 131,411 | 28,667 | 31,903 | 27,701 | 4,202 | 13.17% | 0.92 | 4.12 |
Kirklees | YH | 22,229 | 31,200 | 233,157 | 10,489 | 82,467 | 68,549 | 13,918 | 16.88% | 1.16 | 2.83 |
Lambeth | Lon | 23,973 | 101,883 | 406,488 | 16,956 | 173,767 | 145,465 | 28,302 | 16.29% | 1.22 | 2.34 |
Lancaster | NW | 3,677 | 35,741 | 40,394 | 10,986 | 15,609 | 12,083 | 3,526 | 22.59% | 1.87 | 2.59 |
Leeds | YH | 54,684 | 42,214 | 826,505 | 15,114 | 219,583 | 153,797 | 65,786 | 29.96% | 1.72 | 3.76 |
Leicester | EM | 20,142 | 50,760 | 227,084 | 11,274 | 79,655 | 68,736 | 10,919 | 13.71% | 1.25 | 2.85 |
Lewes | SE | 3,179 | 78,559 | 64,380 | 20,252 | 16,021 | 13,664 | 2,357 | 14.71% | 1.27 | 4.02 |
Lewisham | Lon | 13,796 | 98,015 | 57,543 | 4,171 | 94,887 | 76,975 | 17,912 | 18.88% | 2.04 | 0.61 |
Lincoln | EM | 7,761 | 36,182 | 62,369 | 8,036 | 28,548 | 23,833 | 4,715 | 16.52% | 1.95 | 2.18 |
Luton | East | 7,789 | 64,641 | 134,089 | 17,215 | 38,866 | 34,701 | 4,165 | 10.72% | 0.87 | 3.45 |
Manchester | NW | 15,689 | 36,879 | 269,245 | 17,161 | 61,501 | 36,552 | 24,949 | 40.57% | 2.08 | 4.38 |
Mansfield | EM | 7,400 | 30,608 | 77,937 | 10,532 | 28,125 | 20,978 | 7,147 | 25.41% | 2.58 | 2.77 |
Medway | SE | 2,992 | 55,338 | 41,328 | 13,813 | 14,314 | 10,660 | 3,654 | 25.53% | 1.77 | 2.89 |
Melton | EM | 1,801 | 53,387 | 31,484 | 17,481 | 7,546 | 5,859 | 1,687 | 22.36% | 1.44 | 4.17 |
Mid Devon | SW | 3,001 | 51,254 | 40,061 | 13,349 | 13,052 | 9,273 | 3,779 | 28.95% | 3.38 | 3.07 |
Mid Suffolk | East | 3,230 | 68,001 | 87,370 | 27,050 | 15,335 | 11,545 | 3,790 | 24.71% | 1.42 | 5.70 |
Milton Keynes | SE | 11,118 | 59,621 | 229,571 | 20,649 | 54,933 | 38,232 | 16,701 | 30.40% | 2.28 | 4.18 |
North East Derbyshire | EM | 7,693 | 47,137 | 175,490 | 22,812 | 31,826 | 21,147 | 10,679 | 33.55% | 2.08 | 5.51 |
New Forest | SE | 5,120 | 73,680 | 142,039 | 27,742 | 28,002 | 20,084 | 7,918 | 28.28% | 1.82 | 5.07 |
Newark & Sherwood | EM | 5,497 | 55,232 | 101,298 | 18,428 | 24,433 | 13,842 | 10,591 | 43.35% | 2.45 | 4.15 |
Newcastle upon Tyne | NE | 25,110 | 35,716 | 389,385 | 15,507 | 109,743 | 93,930 | 15,813 | 14.41% | 0.95 | 3.55 |
Newham | Lon | 15,928 | 87,843 | 208,914 | 13,116 | 101,427 | 77,750 | 23,677 | 23.34% | 0.40 | 2.06 |
North Kesteven | EM | 3,842 | 41,618 | 71,224 | 18,538 | 15,671 | 10,462 | 5,209 | 33.24% | 2.40 | 4.54 |
North Tyneside | NE | 14,556 | 45,369 | 339,341 | 23,313 | 61,692 | 34,028 | 27,664 | 44.84% | 1.88 | 5.50 |
North Warwickshire | WM | 2,631 | 58,732 | 49,889 | 18,962 | 11,871 | 8,087 | 3,784 | 31.88% | 2.46 | 4.20 |
Northampton | EM | 11,426 | 51,236 | 202,786 | 17,748 | 51,953 | 44,616 | 7,337 | 14.12% | 1.22 | 3.90 |
Northumberland | YH | 8,442 | 38,402 | 105,145 | 12,455 | 31,062 | 26,374 | 4,688 | 15.09% | 1.23 | 3.39 |
Norwich | East | 14,657 | 55,235 | 205,717 | 14,035 | 67,573 | 50,849 | 16,724 | 24.75% | 2.29 | 3.04 |
Nottingham | EM | 25,388 | 41,301 | 304,742 | 12,003 | 106,524 | 81,247 | 25,277 | 23.73% | 1.75 | 2.86 |
Nuneaton & Bedworth | WM | 5,703 | 37,769 | 79,173 | 13,883 | 25,786 | 23,189 | 2,597 | 10.07% | 1.27 | 3.07 |
North West Leicestershire | EM | 4,196 | 59,313 | 72,865 | 17,365 | 17,709 | 10,132 | 7,577 | 42.79% | 3.39 | 4.11 |
Oadby & Wigston | EM | 1,202 | 53,030 | 20,554 | 17,100 | 4,950 | 4,407 | 543 | 10.97% | 0.99 | 4.15 |
Oxford | SE | 7,669 | 93,109 | 208,219 | 27,151 | 45,458 | 31,947 | 13,511 | 29.72% | 1.75 | 4.58 |
Portsmouth | SE | 14,543 | 46,130 | 176,156 | 12,113 | 83,203 | 81,874 | 1,329 | 1.60% | 0.23 | 2.12 |
Reading | SE | 6,710 | 72,159 | 197,341 | 29,410 | 35,931 | 22,274 | 13,657 | 38.01% | 1.33 | 5.49 |
Redbridge | Lon | 4,442 | 72,132 | 75,138 | 16,915 | 29,460 | 21,336 | 8,124 | 27.58% | 3.42 | 2.55 |
Redditch | WM | 5,685 | 53,160 | 122,158 | 21,488 | 24,208 | 21,887 | 2,321 | 9.59% | 0.55 | 5.05 |
Richmondshire | YH | 1,499 | 45,436 | 18,217 | 12,153 | 6,268 | 5,144 | 1,124 | 17.93% | 2.58 | 2.91 |
Rotherham | YH | 20,185 | 35,099 | 304,125 | 15,067 | 83,941 | 63,376 | 20,565 | 24.50% | 1.51 | 3.62 |
Rugby | WM | 3,789 | 53,422 | 61,632 | 16,266 | 16,393 | 13,248 | 3,145 | 19.19% | 2.09 | 3.76 |
Runnymede | SE | 2,881 | 104,623 | 101,956 | 35,389 | 16,636 | 11,239 | 5,397 | 32.44% | 1.60 | 6.13 |
Sandwell | WM | 28,442 | 40,739 | 466,434 | 16,399 | 119,589 | 79,217 | 40,372 | 33.76% | 2.04 | 3.90 |
Sedgemoor | SW | 4,043 | 35,536 | 56,478 | 13,969 | 17,740 | 15,092 | 2,648 | 14.93% | 1.56 | 3.18 |
Selby | YH | 3,026 | 53,490 | 53,850 | 17,796 | 12,148 | 7,084 | 5,064 | 41.69% | 2.10 | 4.43 |
Sheffield | YH | 38,989 | 36,237 | 345,969 | 8,874 | 149,994 | 119,863 | 30,131 | 20.09% | 2.31 | 2.31 |
Shepway | SE | 3,377 | 51,175 | 47,417 | 14,041 | 16,203 | 11,029 | 5,174 | 31.93% | 3.30 | 2.93 |
Shropshire | WM | 4,049 | 49,922 | 84,595 | 20,893 | 18,366 | 13,581 | 4,785 | 26.05% | 1.60 | 4.61 |
Slough | SE | 6,066 | 96,591 | 154,691 | 25,501 | 35,602 | 28,512 | 7,090 | 19.91% | 1.27 | 4.35 |
Solihull | WM | 9,868 | 46,227 | 174,737 | 17,707 | 44,052 | 32,806 | 11,246 | 25.53% | 1.54 | 3.97 |
South Cambridgeshire | East | 5,199 | 95,402 | 205,123 | 39,454 | 27,986 | 16,521 | 11,465 | 40.97% | 1.59 | 7.33 |
South Derbyshire | EM | 2,970 | 43,037 | 60,084 | 20,230 | 12,399 | 9,630 | 2,769 | 22.33% | 1.73 | 4.85 |
South Holland | EM | 3,779 | 46,075 | 68,609 | 18,155 | 15,962 | 10,724 | 5,238 | 32.82% | 2.23 | 4.30 |
South Kesteven | EM | 5,971 | 41,283 | 106,070 | 17,764 | 24,743 | 17,924 | 6,819 | 27.56% | 2.50 | 4.29 |
South Tyneside | NE | 16,516 | 35,282 | 287,503 | 17,408 | 66,583 | 55,208 | 11,375 | 17.08% | 1.04 | 4.32 |
Southampton | SE | 15,843 | 43,432 | 172,236 | 10,871 | 79,022 | 61,314 | 17,708 | 22.41% | 3.41 | 2.18 |
Southend-on-Sea | East | 6,020 | 68,716 | 98,740 | 16,402 | 27,561 | 19,949 | 7,612 | 27.62% | 2.24 | 3.58 |
Southwark | Lon | 37,147 | 92,288 | 449,357 | 12,097 | 264,407 | 228,074 | 36,333 | 13.74% | 1.57 | 1.70 |
St Albans | East | 4,909 | 115,255 | 166,416 | 33,900 | 28,524 | 19,433 | 9,091 | 31.87% | 1.90 | 5.83 |
Stevenage | East | 7,990 | 79,073 | 214,873 | 26,893 | 43,115 | 31,306 | 11,809 | 27.39% | 1.72 | 4.98 |
Stockport | NW | 11,122 | 42,001 | 146,266 | 13,151 | 53,705 | 47,605 | 6,100 | 11.36% | 1.07 | 2.72 |
Stoke-on-Trent | WM | 17,723 | 32,140 | 156,641 | 8,838 | 66,541 | 62,500 | 4,041 | 6.07% | 0.62 | 2.35 |
Stroud | SW | 4,991 | 55,236 | 94,842 | 19,003 | 23,263 | 18,789 | 4,474 | 19.23% | 1.32 | 4.08 |
Sutton | Lon | 5,996 | 71,550 | 192,016 | 32,024 | 37,478 | 23,360 | 14,118 | 37.67% | 2.16 | 5.12 |
Swindon | SW | 10,281 | 47,129 | 114,016 | 11,090 | 50,655 | 36,304 | 14,351 | 28.33% | 3.97 | 2.25 |
Tamworth | WM | 4,280 | 46,528 | 68,532 | 16,012 | 20,942 | 12,464 | 8,478 | 40.48% | 3.20 | 3.27 |
Tandridge | SE | 2,620 | 126,670 | 64,525 | 24,628 | 14,738 | 12,302 | 2,436 | 16.53% | 1.44 | 4.38 |
Taunton Deane | SW | 5,744 | 53,934 | 109,804 | 19,116 | 26,737 | 22,520 | 4,217 | 15.77% | 1.61 | 4.11 |
Tendring | East | 3,978 | 33,448 | 41,770 | 10,500 | 13,565 | 11,931 | 1,634 | 12.05% | 1.17 | 3.08 |
Thanet | SE | 3,019 | 53,858 | 25,040 | 8,294 | 13,823 | 10,484 | 3,339 | 24.16% | 4.65 | 1.81 |
Thurrock | East | 9,799 | 78,522 | 191,292 | 19,522 | 54,795 | 49,277 | 5,518 | 10.07% | 0.94 | 3.49 |
Tower Hamlets | Lon | 11,477 | 107,770 | 83,293 | 7,257 | 98,165 | 89,323 | 8,842 | 9.01% | 2.47 | 0.85 |
Uttlesford | East | 2,810 | 111,765 | 84,622 | 30,115 | 15,938 | 11,445 | 4,493 | 28.19% | 1.71 | 5.31 |
Waltham Forest | Lon | 9,991 | 90,918 | 200,631 | 20,081 | 61,630 | 42,909 | 18,721 | 30.38% | 1.98 | 3.26 |
Wandsworth | Lon | 17,213 | 91,688 | 330,599 | 19,206 | 143,213 | 110,955 | 32,258 | 22.52% | 7.81 | 2.31 |
Warwick | WM | 5,477 | 75,947 | 135,787 | 24,792 | 28,099 | 21,187 | 6,912 | 24.60% | 1.45 | 4.83 |
Waveney | East | 4,453 | 49,697 | 77,377 | 17,376 | 20,659 | 14,011 | 6,648 | 32.18% | 2.94 | 3.75 |
Waverley | SE | 5,567 | 79,519 | 188,700 | 33,896 | 29,474 | 17,968 | 11,506 | 39.04% | 2.03 | 6.40 |
Wealden | SE | 2,987 | 72,256 | 70,275 | 23,527 | 15,239 | 12,816 | 2,423 | 15.90% | 1.29 | 4.61 |
Welwyn Hatfield | East | 9,018 | 113,252 | 273,433 | 30,321 | 52,573 | 37,148 | 15,425 | 29.34% | 2.45 | 5.20 |
West Lancashire | NW | 5,895 | 29,325 | 82,054 | 13,919 | 25,271 | 17,370 | 7,901 | 31.27% | 2.58 | 3.25 |
Westminster | Lon | 11,837 | 140,940 | 261,283 | 22,073 | 108,850 | 93,222 | 15,628 | 14.36% | 1.56 | 2.40 |
Wigan | NW | 21,676 | 27,199 | 315,000 | 14,532 | 88,143 | 75,903 | 12,240 | 13.89% | 0.85 | 3.57 |
Wiltshire | SW | 5,307 | 56,389 | 123,297 | 23,233 | 26,218 | 21,129 | 5,089 | 19.41% | 1.42 | 4.70 |
Winchester | SE | 5,094 | 87,208 | 164,022 | 32,199 | 29,836 | 21,265 | 8,571 | 28.73% | 1.66 | 5.50 |
Woking | SE | 3,331 | 87,577 | 135,881 | 40,793 | 18,835 | 11,910 | 6,925 | 36.77% | 1.40 | 7.21 |
Wokingham | SE | 2,632 | 84,857 | 88,324 | 33,558 | 14,800 | 10,034 | 4,766 | 32.20% | 1.75 | 5.97 |
Wolverhampton | WM | 21,940 | 38,464 | 253,256 | 11,543 | 95,700 | 65,600 | 30,100 | 31.45% | 3.10 | 2.65 |
Total |
| 1,568,237 | 61,533 | 26,515,946 | 16,908 | 8,016,342 | 6,242,976 | 1,773,366 | 22.12% | 1.67 | 3.31 |
The weighted average cost of capital recorded in HRAs increased slightly from 3.9 per cent to 4.0 per cent – perhaps as a result of the refinancing of existing loans in preparation for lower future rates going forward.
Loan-to-value ratios reduced slightly from 28 per cent to 27 per cent as asset valuation strengthened. This continues to represent a very low result compared to housing associations, and one that strongly suggests that a review of the current region-based valuation methodology is long overdue – it is simply no longer fit for purpose for a post-debt-cap HRA.
Debt to turnover ratios increased slightly from 3.2 to 3.3, still below the housing association sector equivalent.
The national position over time
We have now undertaken this analysis for three full financial years, from 2017 to 2020, and some key trends over time are emerging.
Property numbers have reduced by a net 1.1 per cent between 2017/18 and 2019/20, while turnover has reduced 3.0 per cent and operating costs have risen 4.4 per cent. Debt is up 3.1 per cent per unit over the two years. Behind these consolidated movements is a more nuanced story.
The changes in turnover and operating costs were actually more pronounced between 2017/18 and 2018/19 – a period when spending decisions were taken before the announcement of the removal of the debt cap and the sector was still in the throes of the rent cut when the focus of authorities was to manage risk driven by reducing income.
In the first full year after the debt cap, the reduction in turnover slowed, as did the increase in operating costs, with borrowing for investment beginning to increase. Hence, as the charts show, the reduction in interest cover slowed in 2019/20, driven by a slowing reduction in operating margins.
Taken together, these show a sector characterised by resilience, which has responded by managing the consolidated reduction in income driven by four years of the rent cut, through control of operating costs so that after the debt cap was removed, there are clear signs that authorities had begun to respond to the incentive to invest.
The regional position
Behind the national position lies significant variation at the authority level, and a look at the table showing the regional split for some key measures between 2018/19 and 2019/20 offers some insight into the trends locally.
London HRAs continue to offer a major contrast to the other regions, with higher rents, lower operating margins and the lowest interest cover of all regions. The reduction in interest cover in London is particularly marked, a drop of 0.44 compared to an average drop of 0.16 in the other regions where interest cover has tightened, and an actual increase in interest cover in the South East and Yorkshire and the Humber.
The South West, the South East and the East of England continue to offer significant capacity to invest with a slight net reduction of interest cover across these three regions, but still averaging close to 2.0.
Net reductions across the Midlands and northern regions were very similar, with average interest cover across these five regions around the national average.
Operating margins decreased as expected across all regions, with above-average reductions in London, the East of England, the South West and the East Midlands.
Perhaps the most startling statistic in the regional table is the net increase in stock in the East of England between years. In the face of continued high levels of Right to Buy discounts, local authorities across that region (like many across the country) have begun to arrest decades of net decline, achieved with only a modest increase in borrowing per unit of 0.8 per cent.
Unit operating costs position
Turnover per unit has reduced by 1.9 per cent (£5,211 to £5,112) between 2017/18 and 2019/20, while operating costs per unit have increased 5.6 per cent over the same period (£3,769 to £3,981), resulting in a reduction in operating surpluses of around a fifth. These are entirely within expectations given the challenges posed by the policy and operating environment prior to the abolition of the debt cap.
It is also interesting to begin to analyse these measures at a regional level. There is considerable variation around the average unit turnover of £5,112 – with London authorities on average clear outliers with turnover/unit above £7,000. This is 75 per cent higher than the equivalent unit turnover in Yorkshire and the Humber authorities, while other regions are much more closely settled around the non-London average.
This is matched by similar trends in unit operating costs, with the London authorities well above the national average of £3,981 at nearly £5,900 per unit. What is particularly interesting is how these gross measures convert into operating surpluses per unit. Surpluses in London were in fact exactly the national average for the year, while the South West, the East Midlands and the North West showed lower unit surpluses and the East and the South East showed stronger unit surpluses.
It will be interesting to see how these unit income and expenditure measures compare to the housing association sector. With the impending change to more proactive regulation of local authorities, we might expect to see more focus on the way that authorities raise income and spend on services and their stock.
While much of the focus since the removal of the debt cap (and in this summary) has been on the capacity for investment, the analysis also provides a strong platform for beginning to understand more around what this says about the way that local authorities spend on services and existing stock, and many may be looking at drawing on investment capacity for major investment in areas such as building safety and net zero carbon.
One thing we are able to predict confidently is that both unit turnover and costs for local authorities will be well below housing associations, even adjusting for VAT. While it is tempting to jump to generalisations, the picture will of course be more complex and more localised.
Regions | Number of units | Unit % change | Debt per unit (£) | Debt / unit change | Average rents (£) | Operating margin (2018/19) | Operating margin (2019/20) | Interest cover ratio (2018/19) | Interest cover ratio (2019/20) | Turnover per unit (£) | Operating costs per unit (£) | Operating surplus per unit (£) |
London | 390,979 | -0.25% | 16,957 | 4.0% | 104.57 | 18.1% | 16.1% | 1.80 | 1.36 | 7,027 | 5,897 | 1,131 |
East of England | 155,717 | 0.55% | 22,998 | 0.8% | 88.60 | 29.7% | 25.6% | 2.00 | 1.74 | 5,116 | 3,806 | 1,310 |
South East | 168,771 | -0.16% | 21,070 | 1.2% | 91.29 | 28.0% | 27.2% | 2.01 | 2.06 | 5,303 | 3,861 | 1,441 |
South West | 93,585 | -0.15% | 13,247 | 2.1% | 78.44 | 22.6% | 20.1% | 2.24 | 1.96 | 4,508 | 3,600 | 907 |
East Midlands | 169,855 | -0.11% | 15,205 | 1.8% | 73.43 | 27.3% | 23.8% | 2.05 | 1.78 | 4,125 | 3,143 | 982 |
West Midlands | 196,404 | -0.72% | 16,822 | 1.2% | 77.64 | 28.0% | 26.3% | 1.80 | 1.70 | 4,363 | 3,217 | 1,146 |
Yorkshire and the Humber | 233,789 | -0.99% | 13,264 | 1.3% | 71.29 | 26.0% | 26.8% | 1.89 | 1.91 | 3,971 | 2,907 | 1,064 |
North West | 78,723 | -0.60% | 13,857 | 1.6% | 72.75 | 24.3% | 23.5% | 1.90 | 1.69 | 4,165 | 3,186 | 980 |
North East | 80,414 | -0.69% | 17,792 | 2.1% | 73.35 | 25.4% | 23.9% | 1.47 | 1.41 | 4,250 | 3,235 | 1,015 |
Nationwide | 1,568,237 | -0.35% | 16,908 | 2.1% | 85.09 | 23.9% | 22.1% | 1.89 | 1.67 | 5,112 | 3,981 | 1,131 |
Summary
Our analysis of the 2019/20 finances shows a resilient sector that has coped well with four years of rent cuts and that is beginning to put in place plans for growth. While all the main metrics have tightened, authorities used the first full year after the abolition of the debt cap to begin to invest. In fact, despite COVID-19 challenges, the capacity for increased investment remains strong and significant, on any key measure.
Taking operating margin and interest cover together, if authorities continue to implement Consumer Price Index (CPI) plus one per cent rent increases to April 2024, and unit operating costs are able to be held to CPI increases, operating margins would strengthen to 27 per cent by 2024/25 and interest cover against existing debt levels would rise to 2.4.
In turn this would convert into borrowing capacity above the minimum 1.25 golden rule of c.£16bn at a national level – even at prevailing average interest rates of about four per cent. When we factor in the ability to borrow at current Public Works Loan Board rates, this additional capacity rises further – perhaps as much as £18bn.
The picture therefore continues to be one of the potential for growth. Of course the sector rightly argues the need for substantial additional subsidy for councils to bring about a true renaissance in council housebuilding. However, the capacity for HRAs themselves to contribute demonstrates that local authorities are in a strong position to respond positively.
Each month Social Housing focuses on a specific aspect of housing finance and collates and scrutinises the data for hundreds of housing organisations.
The reports below contain unparalleled commentary and analysis along with detailed sortable and searchable data tables.
Unit costs 2019 Our analysis of data from the English regulator has found that unit costs have risen among all types of housing association, with overall maintenance costs seeing the highest weighted average increase of nearly seven per cent
Impairment 2019 Housing associations’ impairments rise almost 40% in a year, driven by fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values
Global accounts 2018/19 Housing associations’ surplus for the year before tax decreased by five per cent to £3.76bn, driven by a 6.6 per cent drop in England
Affordable rent profile 2018/19 The level of affordable lettings dropped for the third year in a row
Staff pay Data from audited accounts of 206 housing associations shows that average staff pay in 2018/19 was £31,787 – a rise of 3.2 per cent over a 12-month period
Professionals’ league Our exclusive professionals’ league finds that activity continued apace in 2019, when housing associations increasingly looked to private placements
Sales proceeds Despite a 10 per cent rise in housing associations’ income from development sales in the last financial year, sales revenue is likely to remain flat over the coming years as a result of the property market downturn
Capital commitments The total capital commitments of 200 housing associations rose by 15 per cent in the past year, analysis by Social Housing has found
Reliance on sales surplus Social Housing finds that the total sales surplus of 150 English registered providers has dropped by nearly 10 per cent, as a result of lower market sales surplus
Stock dispersal How many council areas does your housing association operate in? How concentrated is its stock?
Accounts digest 2018/19 How does your housing association’s finances compare to others?
Housing Revenue Account part two How do councils compare in their 2018/19 Housing Revenue Account positions? Steve Partridge of Savills takes an in-depth look
Diversification of income We look at how housing associations are diversifying their income, and finds that they made 10.3 per cent more revenue from shared ownership and non-social housing activity
Impairment 2017/18 Social Housing takes a close look at the accounts of the 130 largest housing associations, and finds that impairments rose by nearly a third to £78.4m in 2018
Global accounts Social Housing’s analysis of the sector’s global accounts finds that housing associations’ pre-tax surplus fell last year – driven by drops in England, Scotland and Wales (August 2019)
Affordable rent profile We find that the number of affordable rent lettings recorded last year by housing associations in England has dropped for the second year in a row, suggesting that the sector is shifting away from the tenure
Capital commitments We scrutinise the capital commitments of the 208 largest housing associations in the UK (June 2019)
Housing Revenue Account part one Steve Partridge of Savills takes a look at the financial factors councils should consider in their Housing Revenue Account business planning (May 2019)
Reliance on sales surplus Our analysis reveals that profits form 42 per cent of 150 English housing associations’ total surplus (April 2019)
Sales proceeds We look at housing associations’ build-for-sale income and find a two per cent increase in 2017/18 (March 2019)
Shared ownership sales England, excluding London, has seen a four per cent rise in shared ownership sales – much lower than last year’s 16 per cent increase (February 2019)
Stock dispersal We show that housing associations’ general needs stock is becoming more concentrated within their local authority areas (January 2019)
Social Housing’s weekly news bulletin delivers the latest news and insight across finance and funding, regulation and governance, policy and strategy, straight to your inbox. Meanwhile, news alerts bring you the biggest stories as they land.
Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters.
RELATED