ao link

Special report: trend of increasing stock consolidation continues

Analysis by Social Housing has found that housing association stock per local authority area has become more concentrated, with the average number of general needs units per area rising to 589

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Special report: find details of housing associations’ spread over local authority areas #ukhousing #socialhousingfinance

How do housing associations compare when it comes to stock dispersal? Find out in this month’s special report #ukhousing #socialhousingfinance

The concentration of housing association stock per local authority area is on the rise, continuing a trend among the sector of increased stock consolidation.

 

Analysis by Social Housing shows that there were an average of 589 general needs units per local authority area in 2018/19. This was a notable increase on the 578 units per local authority area the year before, and the 539 units reported in 2015, when this report began.

 

General needs excludes supported housing and housing for older people. It includes general needs homes rented at both social (about 50 per cent of market rent) and affordable (up to 80 per cent of market rent) levels.

 


Summary of RPs’ presence in local authority areas, 2018/19

 

Size band of general needs units* Number of RPs** Average number of general needs units per RP Average number of local authorities Average number of general needs units per local authority
10,000+ 63

24,183

41

588

5,000-9,999

53

6,933

10

692

2,500-4,999 39

3,640

8

432

Total 155

13,116

22 589

 

Notes: *Self-contained general needs units owned, excludes managed units owned by other RPs; **155 RPs (at group level) each owning more than 2,500 units of self-contained general needs stock (total two million units)

Source: Regulator of Social Housing, Statistical Data Return 2018/19

 

The figures were compiled from the Statistical Data Return for 2018/19 and focus on registered providers (RPs) with general needs stock of 2,500 units or more. They come more than a decade after the Housing Corporation, predecessor to Homes England and the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH), published its Rationalisation of Housing Association Stock: a Guide and Toolkit in 2008.

 

The policy was intended to improve housing association (HA) efficiency and release funds to build more homes and, over this time, has proven successful – with stock rationalisation rising up the boardroom agenda.

 

This sentiment is echoed in this year’s research, which shows a continued desire among RPs to drive efficiencies through their organisation by consolidating their stock. Although, clearly, each RP has its own unique portfolio strategy and drivers for this.


Read more

Special report: how do housing associations’ finances compare to others?Special report: how do housing associations’ finances compare to others?
Special reports librarySpecial reports library
Concentration of general needs housing stock risesConcentration of general needs housing stock rises

Commenting on the increase in stock consolidation, Helen Collins, head of Savills Housing Consultancy, noted: “This [figure is representative] of the direction of travel that we’re continuing to see and I think the drivers are good-quality customer service as well as efficiency to concentrate management, which we’ve been seeing – albeit it has been at a very slow, steady rate of consolidation.”

 

She added: “A combination of merger and footprint rationalisation is still very present in the marketplace. The other driving factor is active asset management. More of our clients are getting more granular in terms of understanding the performance of their asset base and then are thinking about what makes the most sense for them as a business.”

Charles Cleal, a director at JLL’s Living Advisory, says: “Some of that [589 figure] will be mergers, some will be growth and then a very small portion will be through transactions in my view, because there still aren’t enough transactions [in the marketplace].”

 

Social Housing has broken down the number of general needs units into three size band thresholds: 10,000+ general needs units; 5,000-9,999 general needs units; and 2,500-4,999 general needs units.

 

Unlike last year, the biggest change seen with RPs when looking at the average number of general needs units per local authority area was within the 2,500-4,999 bracket. RPs here saw a seven per cent decrease to 432 general needs units per local authority area, compared with 464 the year before.

 

In contrast, the 10,000+ and 5,000-9,999 size bands saw increases in the average number of general needs stock (albeit small ones) of three per cent and 0.9 per cent respectively.

 

As for the spread of RPs among local authority areas, this year there are fewer RPs that are active in just one to five local authority areas. The data shows that 11 RPs hold general needs stock in one local authority area, compared with nearly 20 the year before. Likewise, 38 RPs had stock in two to five local authority areas, compared to more than 40 the year before.



10,000+ general needs stock

 

In the largest size band, Clarion once again tops the list as the biggest RP with 90,682 general needs units. For this reason, Social Housing has taken a close look at the provider’s stock dispersal to see how it has changed over the past year.

 

Its average number of general needs units per local authority area has decreased to 563, from 570 the year before. Meanwhile, the number of local authority areas Clarion currently holds general needs stock in has increased from 159 to 161, which suggests that its geographical spread is widening while its stock is becoming less concentrated.

 

At the same time, its average number of general needs units per local authority area as a percentage of its total general needs stock was 0.6 per cent – remaining unchanged from last year.

 

That said, these figures do not take into account a stock deal by Clarion in June this year, which included the sale of 154 homes in Stafford to Stafford and Rural Homes, which has more than 6,000 homes in the town and surrounding area. The sale included 152 general needs homes – all the general needs stock Clarion had in the area in March when these figures were compiled – and two sheltered housing properties that would not be included in the figures in this report.

 

Mr Cleal, whose company JLL was involved in the deal, also pointed to Clarion’s 10-year plan to sell 10,000 homes as part of a stock rationalisation programme. He said that the provider is “better than most” when it comes to assessing its stock.

 

The plan was announced in 2017, in a bid to narrow its geographical footprint following the merger of Circle and Affinity Sutton (which joined forces in 2016 to form the RP). At the time, the RP had stock in 159 local authority areas.

 

Today it has fewer than 50 units in 47 local authority areas and fewer than 10 units in 11 local authority areas, including South Holland (1), Bromsgrove (1), Worcester (2) and Wolverhampton (3). However, these areas are in the same West Midlands region (except South Holland, which is in the neighbouring East Midlands region) – which would still enable the provider to drive efficiency.

RPs’ presence in local authority areas (10,000+ general needs units)

Peer group average

41

24,183

588

2.4

10,000+ general needs units*

Number of local authorities

Number of general needs units*

Average number of general needs units per local authority*

Number% of general needs total

Rochdale Boroughwide Housing

1

11,898

11,898

100

First Choice Homes Oldham

1

11,438

11,438

100

County Durham Housing Group

2

17,991

8,996

50

Bolton at Home

2

14,888

7,444

50

Gentoo Group

4

28,376

7,094

25

Wythenshawe Community Housing Group

2

13,334

6,667

50

One Manchester

2

11,501

5,751

50

Incommunities

5

20,707

4,141

20

Torus62

8

33,052

4,132

12.5

Plymouth Community Homes

3

12,303

4,101

33.3

ForViva Group

4

16,203

4,051

25

Wirral Partnership Homes

3

10,860

3,620

33.3

Wakefield And District Housing

9

29,264

3,252

11.1

Knowsley Housing Trust

5

12,223

2,445

20

Beyond Housing

7

14,351

2,050

14.3

Thirteen Housing Group

15

28,734

1,916

6.7

Lincolnshire Housing Partnership

6

10,036

1,673

16.7

One Vision Housing

7

11,289

1,613

14.3

Karbon Homes

18

22,941

1,275

5.6

Walsall Housing Group

16

19,738

1,234

6.3

Vivid Housing

19

23,123

1,217

5.3

Together Housing Group

28

33,063

1,181

3.6

Jigsaw Homes Group

23

27,113

1,179

4.3

WM Housing Group (Citizen)

22

25,492

1,159

4.5

Flagship Housing Group

22

24,213

1,101

4.5

Peabody Trust

38

41,211

1,085

2.6

The Wrekin Housing Group

10

10,250

1,025

10

Plus Dane Housing

12

11,534

961

8.3

Bernicia Group

11

10,373

943

9.1

Sovereign Housing Association

48

43,387

904

2.1

Onward Group

26

22,309

858

3.8

LiveWest

32

26,885

840

3.1

Yorkshire Housing

18

14,766

820

5.6

L&Q

79

60,658

768

1.3

Midland Heart

32

23,305

728

3.1

Bromford

50

33,029

661

2

Hyde

49

28,994

592

2

Platform Housing Group

58

34,249

591

1.7

Notting Hill Genesis

61

34,513

566

1.6

Clarion Housing Group

161

90,682

563

0.6

Optivo

54

30,043

556

1.9

Radian Group

30

16,035

535

3.3

Aster Group

44

22,662

515

2.3

Your Housing Group

35

17,068

488

2.9

Catalyst Housing

28

13,229

472

3.6

Great Places Housing Group

30

13,132

438

3.3

BPHA

28

11,562

413

3.6

Network Homes

30

12,370

412

3.3

Longhurst Group

42

17,066

406

2.4

Orbit Group

74

29,995

405

1.4

Riverside

92

37,222

405

1.1

Paradigm Housing Group

28

10,918

390

3.6

Southern Housing Group

59

21,584

366

1.7

The Guinness Partnership

127

45,094

355

0.8

EMH Group

33

10,970

332

3

Home Group

115

37,103

323

0.9

Thames Valley Housing Association (Metropolitan Thames Valley)

103

30,876

300

1

A2Dominion

65

19,036

293

1.5

Sanctuary Housing Association

191

51,548

270

0.5

Accent Group

59

15,584

264

1.7

PA Housing

65

15,740

242

1.5

Places for People

215

50,642

236

0.5

Stonewater

124

23,795

192

0.8

A Clarion spokesperson said: “As the largest provider of affordable housing in the country, our long-term approach is to build and manage homes where the need is greatest.

 

“We will focus on building and maintaining communities in urban growth hubs, where there is a high demand for affordable housing and Clarion already has a presence in the community. When looking to rationalise our geographical footprint, each decision will be informed by our existing presence in the community and plans
for growth, not the number of local authorities in which we operate.”

 

Commenting on the desire for RPs to tighten their geographical footprint, Ms Collins said: “We are definitely seeing that consolidation towards heartlands. We trade between 2,000 and 4,000 homes a year generally and geography has always played a big part in that, particularly post-merger, but also some of the larger organisations like Home Group and Places for People, any of the national footprint organisations, have looked at footprint rationalisation for a long time.”

 

Major deals driven by this geographical focus include a significant sale in May 2018 between The Guinness Partnership and Karbon Homes. Under the deal Guinness sold 1,300 homes in the North East of England to Karbon in a multimillion-pound deal, in what it described at the time as a “strategy of rationalisation” in the region.

 

“Some of that [589 figure] will be mergers, some will be growth and then a very small portion will be through transactions”

 

A Guinness spokesperson added: “In the North East we have some homes but they are split over several councils and we only have a few in each. We felt it would be better if they were managed by someone with a local focus.”

 

The deal included a mixture of general needs housing, older people’s accommodation, supported housing, shared ownership units and commercial property. It also saw 20 Guinness staff transfer to Karbon. The deal was part of a five-year strategy by Guinness to reconfigure its footprint and concentrate its areas of investment, according to group finance director Phil Day, who revealed the association’s new strategy to Social Housing last December.

 

This overall direction of travel for the RP chimes with this year’s research, which shows Guinness reducing its local authority area count by 10 to 127. Its overall general needs units total decreased to 45,094, from 46,529, while its stock concentration has increased from an average of 340 units to 355.

 

And this is a trend that looks set to continue for Guinness, which is also in the process of completing a major 3,000-home stock swap with Paradigm Housing Group.

 

Under the deal, Guinness will take 1,290 London-based homes from Paradigm, with the latter then taking ownership of 1,608 Guinness units largely in the areas of Wycombe, Welwyn Hatfield and Milton Keynes.

 

“The advantage of a swap is that there’s no loss in revenue for the seller, so you’ve got continuity of revenue stream at the same time as getting the benefit of the operational efficiency, so we expect to see a few more swaps,” explained Ms Collins, whose company is involved in the Guinness deal.

 

However, she noted that “swaps are difficult to pull off because getting portfolios that are reasonably comparable and achieve the aims of the landlords at scale isn’t always as straightforward as you think”.

RPs’ presence in local authority areas (5,000-9,999 general needs units)

Peer group average

106,933

692

10

5,000-9,999 general needs units*

Number of local authorities

Number of general needs units*

Average number of general needs units per local authority*

Number% of general needs total

Salix Homes

1

7,626

7,626

100

Halton Housing

1

6,779

6,779

100

Freebridge Community Housing

1

6,169

6,169

100

Poplar Harca

1

5,359

5,359

100

Trafford Housing Trust

2

6,086

3,043

50

Cobalt Housing

2

5,930

2,965

50

Weaver Vale Housing Trust

2

5,874

2,937

50

Livin Housing

3

8,395

2,798

33.3

Connexus Housing

3

8,381

2,794

33.3

Phoenix Community Housing Association (Bellingham and Downham)

2

5,332

2,666

50

Ongo Homes

5

9,838

1,968

20

Housing Plus Group

5

9,804

1,961

20

Greenfields Community Housing

4

7,690

1,923

25

Southway Housing Trust (Manchester)

3

5,756

1,919

33.3

Vale of Aylesbury Housing Trust

4

6,884

1,721

25

NSAH (Alliance Homes)

4

6,174

1,544

25

Trent & Dove Housing

4

5,747

1,437

25

Aspire Housing

6

8,055

1,343

16.7

Curo Group (Albion)

8

9,400

1,175

12.5

Settle Group

7

7,370

1,053

14.3

Silva Homes

6

5,818

970

16.7

Yarlington Housing Group (Radian)

8

7,700

963

12.5

Community Gateway Association

7

6,136

877

14.3

Cross Keys Homes

12

9,150

763

8.3

Grand Union Housing Group

11

8,222

747

9.1

GreenSquare Group

13

9,253

712

7.7

Irwell Valley Housing Association

9

6,222

691

11.1

Magna Housing

9

6,055

673

11.1

Soha Housing

8

5,283

660

12.5

CHP

13

8,551

658

7.7

Saffron Housing Trust

8

5,183

648

12.5

Raven Housing Trust

8

5,135

642

12.5

Wandle Housing Association

9

5,759

640

11.1

West Kent Housing

9

5,526

614

11.1

Golding Homes

10

5,808

581

10

RHP

12

6,863

572

8.3

Accord Housing Association

16

9,045

565

6.3

Newlon Housing Trust

9

5,009

557

11.1

The Havebury Housing Partnership

11

6,044

549

9.1

Broadacres Housing Association

11

5,803

528

9.1

Town & Country Housing

15

7,646

510

6.7

Regenda

20

9,407

470

5

Futures Housing Group

13

6,051

465

7.7

Westward Housing Group

12

5,117

426

8.3

Swan Housing Association

17

6,974

410

5.9

Mosscare St Vincent’s Housing Group

17

6,733

396

5.9

Acis Group

15

5,602

373

6.7

Castles & Coasts Housing Association

15

5,301

353

6.7

Rooftop Housing Group

16

5,227

327

6.3

Aldwyck Housing Group

22

7,081

322

4.5

One Housing Group

33

9,998

303

3

Nottingham Community Housing Association

28

7,200

257

3.6

Moat Homes

41

9,876

241

2.4

 

Note: *Self-contained general needs units owned, excludes managed units owned by other RPs

Source: Regulator of Social Housing, Statistical Data Return 2018/19

5,000-9,999 general needs units

 

One Housing Group, with 9,998 units, topped the list as the largest RP within the next size band down, displacing Moat, which had previously occupied this spot since 2015.

 

As the figures would suggest, it has been a busy year for One Housing, which has increased its total general needs units by 1,228 since last year’s report. The group has also expanded into two local authority areas, taking its count up to 33, at the same time as increasing its stock concentration per local authority area to an average of 303, up from 297.

 

The RP has also joined the G15 group of large London-based housing associations and has revealed plans to build more than 5,000 homes over the next decade.

 

It also completed £235m of new financing with Irish, Japanese and UK banks, including the first direct loan to the UK social housing sector from Japanese bank SMBC.

 

At the time, Paul Rickard, then group director of finance and resources, said: “[The deal] further strengthens the liquidity of One Housing to help us deliver 5,000 new homes over the next 10 years, as well as protecting us against the current uncertain operating environment. We expect to build on this with additional fundraising in the near term.”

 

More than 65 per cent of its stock was in just three London boroughs: Tower Hamlets (3,018), Camden (2,350) and Newham (1,200). The rest was in relatively close proximity within the Greater London area, spreading from St Albans (30) to Reigate and Banstead (1).

RPs’ presence in local authority areas (2,500-4,999 general needs units)

Peer group average

83,640

432

11.9

2,500-4,999 general needs units*

Number of local authorities

Number of general needs units*

Average number of general needs units per local authority*

Number% of general needs total

Stafford & Rural Homes

1

4,784

4,784

100

Red Kite Community Housing

1

3,983

3,983

100

South Liverpool Homes

1

3,604

3,604

100

Coastline Housing

1

3,523

3,523

100

Ocean Housing Group

1

3,379

3,379

100

Bournville Village Trust

2

3,285

1,643

50

Selwood Housing Society

3

4,735

1,578

33.3

South Lakes Housing

2

2,726

1,363

50

North Devon Homes

2

2,715

1,358

50

Cheshire Peaks & Plains Housing Trust

3

3,890

1,297

33.3

Teign Housing

2

2,559

1,280

50

WATMOS Community Homes

2

2,547

1,274

50

The Community Housing Group

3

3,568

1,189

33.3

Greatwell Homes

4

4,366

1,092

25

Watford Community Housing Trust

4

4,121

1,030

25

Gloucester City Homes

4

3,928

982

25

Calico Homes

4

3,485

871

25

Leeds Federated Housing Association

4

3,405

851

25

Bromsgrove District Housing Trust

4

2,672

668

25

Worthing Homes

5

3,109

622

20

B3 Living

6

3,524

587

16.7

Two Rivers Housing

6

3,255

543

16.7

Hexagon Housing Association

7

3,604

515

14.3

Cottsway Housing Association

9

4,481

498

11.1

Saxon Weald

9

4,143

460

11.1

Progress Housing Group

11

4,825

439

9.1

Housing Solutions

9

3,863

429

11.1

Shepherds Bush Housing Association

9

3,431

381

11.1

Octavia Housing

10

3,776

378

10

Broadland Housing Association

11

4,094

372

9.1

Thrive Homes

11

3,557

323

9.1

South Yorkshire Housing Association

12

3,781

315

8.3

North Star Housing Group

10

3,008

301

10

Origin Housing

15

3,996

266

6.7

Orwell Housing Association

11

2,753

250

9.1

Hightown Housing Association

17

4,027

237

5.9

Estuary Housing Association

16

3,409

213

6.3

Muir Group Housing Association

27

3,931

146

3.7

Hastoe Housing Association

70

4,132

59

1.4

 

Note: *Self-contained general needs units owned, excludes managed units owned by other RPs

Source: Regulator of Social Housing, Statistical Data Return 2018/19

Moat Homes, which had the largest number of units in the 5,000-9,999 category in 2018, has seen comparatively marginal movement in its figures since last year. The RP’s local authority area count remains at 41, while its overall general needs unit figure has increased to 9,876, from 9,764. Its average units per local authority area also increased from 238 to 241.

 

Similarly to One Housing, and many other RPs in the sector, Moat has been ramping up its financing activities. In August, it secured a forward purchase agreement to tap an existing bond, which is due to be repaid in 2041, for an extra £100m. Under the terms, Moat was able to borrow the money on 8 November 2019, eight days after the date on which prime minister Boris Johnson had then promised to take the UK out of the EU.

 

Greg Taylor, the group’s executive director of finance and corporate services, described the transaction at the time as “very security efficient” for Moat, with the funds able to support the organisation’s development programme “over the coming years”.

 

In May 2019, Moat returned to a top governance rating after a previous judgement by the RSH said it had exercised insufficient oversight when it disposed of 26 homes for older people to a for-profit registered provider (RP).

Clarion: geographical spread

Local authority nameNumber of general needs units

Bromley

10,343

Tonbridge and Malling

6,307

Merton

5,864

Tower Hamlets

3,954

Mid Sussex

3,945

Hertsmere

3,863

Fenland

3,599

Broadland

3,308

Mole Valley

2,999

East Hertfordshire

2,579

Islington

2,531

Waltham Forest

1,585

Birmingham

1,546

Plymouth

1,439

Haringey

1,423

Hackney

1,264

Camden

990

Southwark

981

Chichester

928

Brighton and Hove

913

Basingstoke and Deane

879

Kensington and Chelsea

869

Luton

801

South Tyneside

752

Lewisham

747

Dacorum

726

Basildon

706

Chelmsford

694

Stoke-on-Trent

682

Barking and Dagenham

623

Bradford

622

Milton Keynes

614

Leeds

610

Plus 20,555 homes in 95 local authorities

Epsom and Ewell

25

Gosport

24

Solihull

24

South Somerset

24

Thanet

24

Winchester

22

Colchester

21

Mid Devon

20

Folkestone and Hythe

18

Wycombe

17

Eastleigh

16

Three Rivers

16

Wiltshire

16

Harrow

15

South Oxfordshire

15

Christchurch

14

Lichfield

14

Hart

13

Suffolk Coastal

13

Bexley

12

Surrey Heath

12

Wandsworth

12

Hastings

9

South Kesteven

9

Epping Forest

8

Woking

7

Test Valley

6

Kettering

5

West Oxfordshire

3

Wolverhampton

3

Worcester

2

Bromsgrove

1

South Holland

1

2,500-4,999 general needs units

 

Progress Housing Group is now the largest RP within the smallest size band, after Victory (which topped the list last year) merged with Flagship Housing in January.

 

The total number of general needs units for Progress increased to 4,825 from 4,716, while its local authority area count stayed at 11. This saw its average number of units per local authority area increase by 10 to 439, while its general needs units per local authority area as a percentage of total stock stood at 9.1 per cent.

 

In its latest accounts, the group laid out its ambition to “more than double” its current development output with plans to build 250 new homes a year. As part of its continued asset management strategy throughout the year, the group also said it had found “no significant schemes” that were poor performing.

 

That said, in April 2018, Progress assessed its supported living activity (the numbers for which are not included in this data, but are nonetheless noteworthy as a wider demonstration of the RP’s asset management strategy) and in June it commissioned a report from the Housing Quality Network to analyse the cost of providing maintenance services to dispersed supported living stock.

 

The findings showed that the smaller the operational footprint in the area, the higher the cost, regardless of geography, and low volume cancels out the benefits of cheaper labour costs.

 

As for its general needs stock, this year’s research shows that the bulk of its units are within South Ribble (2,727), Fylde (1,599) and Chorley (235). Its remaining eight local authority areas had 56 fewer units but these were all in geographically neighbouring areas.

One Housing: geographical spread

Local authority nameNumber of general needs units

Tower Hamlets

3,018

Camden

2,350

Newham

1,200

Windsor and Maidenhead

428

Westminster

427

Islington

363

Hackney

343

Enfield

299

Slough

280

Haringey

211

West Berkshire

153

Tendring

130

Barnet

120

Reading

117

Havering

90

Wokingham

82

South Oxfordshire

60

Lambeth

59

Waltham Forest

41

Kingston upon Thames

38

Bracknell Forest

33

Hounslow

32

St Albans

30

Bedford

29

Ealing

14

Lewisham

14

Redbridge

12

Wandsworth

10

Southwark

8

Harrow

4

Bexley

1

Brent

1

Reigate and Banstead

1

Wider market trends

 

As seen elsewhere in the housing sector, increased focused on fire safety standards and compliance post-Grenfell are also having an impact on this part of the market. Mr Cleal noted how due diligence is taking longer, with some transactions slowing.

 

“There’s, rightly, a greater focus on integrating compliance information when purchasing stock, which does slow transactions down,” he said. “When we’re acting for purchasers, [we are ensuring] the stock is compliant and the fire risk assessments are up to date and the fire risk assessment action that’s recommended by a certain date is being completed.

 

“But fire risk assessments are a big moving beast and they are constantly changing. In terms of purchases, you don’t take a view about fire safety any more and look to improve it later. You want a plan in place for when you take the stock on that says it’s either compliant on day one, which it really should be, or you are going to sort that very early to make sure it’s compliant.”

 

While Mr Cleal does not see this as a major issue, he said: “The due diligence process takes longer but the way to mitigate that if you’re selling is make sure you have all the information up front and your stock is totally compliant.

“Lots of these portfolios comprise a large amount of properties in different locations and different buildings, so it’s not like we’re dealing with one building.”

Progress: geographical spread

Local authority nameNumber of general needs units

South Ribble

2,727

Fylde

1,599

Chorley

235

South Lakeland

56

West Lancashire

47

Hyndburn

43

Wyre

34

Blackpool

32

Preston

25

Lancaster

15

Ribble Valley

12

Social Housing special reports

Social Housing special reports

Each month Social Housing focuses on a specific aspect of housing finance and collates and scrutinises the data for hundreds of housing organisations.

 

The reports below contain unparalleled commentary and analysis along with detailed sortable and searchable data tables.

 

 

Unit costs 2019 Our analysis of data from the English regulator has found that unit costs have risen among all types of housing association, with overall maintenance costs seeing the highest weighted average increase of nearly seven per cent

 

Impairment 2019 Housing associations’ impairments rise almost 40% in a year, driven by fire safety costs, contractor insolvencies and reduced land values

 

Global accounts 2018/19 Housing associations’ surplus for the year before tax decreased by five per cent to £3.76bn, driven by a 6.6 per cent drop in England

 

Affordable rent profile 2018/19 The level of affordable lettings dropped for the third year in a row

 

Staff pay Data from audited accounts of 206 housing associations shows that average staff pay in 2018/19 was £31,787 – a rise of 3.2 per cent over a 12-month period

 

Professionals’ league Our exclusive professionals’ league finds that activity continued apace in 2019, when housing associations increasingly looked to private placements

 

Sales proceeds Despite a 10 per cent rise in housing associations’ income from development sales in the last financial year, sales revenue is likely to remain flat over the coming years as a result of the property market downturn

 

Capital commitments The total capital commitments of 200 housing associations rose by 15 per cent in the past year, analysis by Social Housing has found

 

Reliance on sales surplus Social Housing finds that the total sales surplus of 150 English registered providers has dropped by nearly 10 per cent, as a result of lower market sales surplus

 

Stock dispersal How many council areas does your housing association operate in? How concentrated is its stock?

 

Accounts digest 2018/19 How does your housing association’s finances compare to others?

 

Housing Revenue Account part two How do councils compare in their 2018/19 Housing Revenue Account positions? Steve Partridge of Savills takes an in-depth look

 

Diversification of income We look at how housing associations are diversifying their income, and finds that they made 10.3 per cent more revenue from shared ownership and non-social housing activity

 

Impairment 2017/18 Social Housing takes a close look at the accounts of the 130 largest housing associations, and finds that impairments rose by nearly a third to £78.4m in 2018

 

Global accounts Social Housing’s analysis of the sector’s global accounts finds that housing associations’ pre-tax surplus fell last year – driven by drops in England, Scotland and Wales (August 2019)

 

Affordable rent profile We find that the number of affordable rent lettings recorded last year by housing associations in England has dropped for the second year in a row, suggesting that the sector is shifting away from the tenure

 

Capital commitments We scrutinise the capital commitments of the 208 largest housing associations in the UK (June 2019)

 

Housing Revenue Account part one Steve Partridge of Savills takes a look at the financial factors councils should consider in their Housing Revenue Account business planning (May 2019)

 

Reliance on sales surplus Our analysis reveals that profits form 42 per cent of 150 English housing associations’ total surplus (April 2019)

 

Sales proceeds We look at housing associations’ build-for-sale income and find a two per cent increase in 2017/18 (March 2019)

 

Shared ownership sales England, excluding London, has seen a four per cent rise in shared ownership sales – much lower than last year’s 16 per cent increase (February 2019)

 

Stock dispersal We show that housing associations’ general needs stock is becoming more concentrated within their local authority areas (January 2019)

 

Click here to find more special reports

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.