ao link

Second UK housing association adopts pan-European ESG label

A major G15 housing association has become only the second registered provider in the UK to adopt a pan-European certification designed to measure housing providers’ performance around environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Portobello Square, a Catalyst development in west London (Picture: Catalyst)
Portobello Square, a Catalyst development in west London (Picture: Catalyst)
Sharelines

.@catalysthousing adopts pan-European ESG label #UKhousing #SocialHousingFinance

A major G15 housing association has become only the second registered provider in the UK to adopt a pan-European certification designed to measure housing providers’ performance around #ESG criteria #UKHousing #SocialHousingFinance

"We think we’re an incredible ethical investment, and this allows us to demonstrate that so we get the advantages of doing that" ~ @catalysthousing #UKhousing #SocialHousingFinance #ESG

Delivered by German real estate and finance consultancy Ritterwald, the Certified Sustainable Housing Label was first adopted by Clarion in November 2019. It is the framework behind Clarion’s sector-first ‘sustainability’ bond in January 2020, and its subsequent £300m issuance in November.

 

Now Catalyst, which manages circa 34,000 homes in London and the Home Counties, will join a small handful of housing providers in Europe in holding the certification.

 

Alongside Clarion, two other housing providers are label-holders: Gewobag in Germany and Vilogia in France. A number of other associations, including Ymere in the Netherlands, are currently completing the assessment process.

 

Ian McDermott, chief executive of Catalyst, said that adopting the label enabled the group to capture and communicate its pre-existing ESG credentials, with a view to benefiting from the growing focus from investors on these qualities.

 

“Increasingly, capital is measuring ethical investment, we think we’re an incredible ethical investment, and this allows us to demonstrate that so we get the advantages of doing that.

 

“We are fundamentally ESG by our very nature, and the opportunity to codify, measure, articulate and then communicate that, in a language familiar not just to this country but internationally, using international measures, made it a really compelling reason.”

 

Mr McDermott said the accreditation ensures that Catalyst remains attractive to investors, particularly when approaching the capital markets. But he added: “It’s also a really healthy internal discipline for us to be able to structure things in this way – it gives a clarity and a comparability to what we do.”


Read more

Hyde to report ESG targets annually to attract ‘right kind’ of investorsHyde to report ESG targets annually to attract ‘right kind’ of investors

Catalyst, which tapped its existing 2047 bond for £150m in June at 155bps over gilts, is currently “recalibrating” its development projects to establish what required funding looks like going forward.

 

“We are very liquid at the moment, and that’s great, so there is no immediate need. But when next we need to go to the market we will be taking full advantage of the accreditation,” Mr McDermott said.

 

Clarion’s recent performance in the capital markets would seem to attest to the strength of having the label. Issuing its second sustainability bond through its £3bn Euro Medium-Term Note programme in November, the group broke its own pricing record for the lowest-priced primary housing association issuance. With a coupon of just 1.25 per cent, the 12-year, £300m bond priced at only 95bps over gilts.

 

At the time, Gareth Francis, director of treasury and corporate finance at the circa 127,000-home association, told Social Housing that offering a sustainable bond helped to achieve the low price, with “ethical funds as well as ESG funds” included in the circa £850m order book. “We started to see greater demand and that leads to greater pricing tension,” he said.

 

Dr Mathias Hain, managing director of Berlin-based Ritterwald, said that the impressive result was indicative of investor trends. “The market for green, social and sustainability bonds has grown to more than $300bn last year and will exceed $400bn by far this year. There’s a huge amount of liquidity and money in the market that is seeking sustainability investment.”

While the housing sector itself is well equipped to be an ESG investment, he said, enabling differentiation between organisations in terms of their specific performance is also important for investor engagement. “There are differences between the participants – that’s why we have categories, and who is scoring at what score to show to investors that there is a difference.”

 

The adoption of the label is the latest step Catalyst has taken within the sustainable finance space. It signed a £50m sustainability-linked loan with Japanese bank Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation at the start of the year. Through that deal, the margin Catalyst will pay is tied to pre-agreed metrics related to the work of its community investment division.

 

The association’s name also appears among the list of 43 housing associations signed up as early adopters of a new ESG standard for UK social housing at its launch on 10 November. The ‘Sustainability Reporting Standard for Social Housing’ has been developed over the course of a year through a sector working group involving major housing associations, lenders and advisors, facilitated by consultancy The Good Economy and to which Ritterwald also contributed.

 

Mr McDermott said that the Ritterwald framework and label are entirely compatible with the UK sector standard.

 

“There is a common DNA running through all of this, from the UN sustainable development goals, through to The Good Economy [sector standard], to the Ritterwald accreditation,” he said.

Ian McDermott, chief executive of Catalyst
Ian McDermott, chief executive of Catalyst

“I believe that they are all consistent with one another and build on the work that is being done by each, so absolutely we see them as compatible.”

 

Dr Hain added that the cross-pollination of ideas between countries and organisations, as well as the fusion of impact capital expertise from The Good Economy with Ritterwald’s bond market focus, would be

complementary for the ongoing development of the different standards, which will need to evolve with the sector over time.

 

He said: “It’s excellent for us from this continental view to have this domestic experience in the UK housing market, and these two dimensions to it.”

 

To obtain the label, an association must provide Ritterwald with a series of data spanning the organisation from operations to finance to complete its first full annual review under the framework. Ritterwald then evaluates the organisation across its criteria within the three dimensions (E, S and G), and creates its report. This is then passed to a second party opinion (SPO) provider who confirms the documentation and compliance of the certification process.

 

For both Catalyst and Clarion, these were provided by Imug, but a growing number of SPOs are available.

 

Dr Hain said that while this means another step in the certification process, this “aspect of neutrality” is important from the perspective of the financial markets.

 

While Ritterwald’s framework initially covered only environmental and social factors, it now includes a governance category, too.

 

Catalyst becomes the first organisation holding the label to have achieved ‘front-runner’ status on all three categories at its first annual assessment.

 

It will now need to maintain its performance against the criteria when the certification is refreshed on an annual basis.

 

Mr McDermott said that integrating the framework into the organisation feeds into Catalyst’s holistic approach to its priorities. “When we are building a development we will look at the home, we will look at the environmental credentials of the home that we are building, but we will also look at the building overall, we will look at the neighbourhood and we will look at the local economy, and what are the structure and economic stresses and strains of that particular area. I think this label absolutely captures that in a way which I think other measures don’t quite do.”

Certified Sustainable Housing Label

Four housing providers have been certified to date:

 

Gewobag

70,000 homes, Germany

 

Vilogia

73,000 homes, France

 

Clarion

127,00 homes, UK

 

Catalyst

34,000 homes, UK

 

Catalyst’s key focus, like for many associations, is on building safety and “putting right all of the legacy effects of building safety”, Mr McDermott said. But the organisation is introducing principles to support its work towards carbon-neutral targets to guide its investment in stock.

 

“We think it’s really important you start with principles and then you work out the strategy on the back of those, so those principles are about dealing with the worst [performing] first, making sure that we integrate into our programmes of component replacement and renewal low-carbon options, making sure that we are supporting the development of technology, but we are working with tried and tested technologies that our customers
are happy with.”

 

He added that it was important for housing associations to work with customers to improve standards and implement change.

 

“We don’t want to be putting in technology which is challenging or difficult, or that actually doesn’t do what we think it should do because it’s not being used as intended – I think we have all had that experience,” he said.

 

The provider also boasts a ‘Gold’ standard in its assessment for the Sustainable Homes Index for Tomorrow (SHIFT) scheme, which benchmarks housing associations’ progress in sustainability.

 

Mr McDermott said that it is important for government to set higher standards and requirements when it comes to the sustainability of new build homes in the wider housebuilding sector to avoid housing associations being at a disadvantage because of their commitments.

 

“It’s not often I call for more regulation, but what’s really important is that we want the government to be more demanding of the housebuilding sector generally. What we don’t want to be doing is to be in a position where [housing associations] are building to a higher standard and as a consequence of that aren’t building at all because we can’t buy land because it’s just not economic to do so; so it’s actually really important that the government moves as quickly as it can.”

 

But Mr McDermott is keen to stress that for housing associations, attention to sustainability and recording key performance indicators in this respect is no longer optional. “This is meat and drink – these are not things to add on to the side of what we are doing. It’s here to stay and it will only become more mainstream.”

Linked InXFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.